• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 2 hours Dutch Populists Shock the EU with Election Victory
  • 10 hours One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 1 hour Venezuela Says Russian Troops Land to Service Military Equipment
  • 5 hours 3 Pipes: EPIC 900K, CACTUS II 670K, GREY OAKS 800K
  • 3 hours Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 7 hours U.S.-China Trade War Poses Biggest Risk To Global Stability
  • 20 hours Climate change's fingerprints are on U.S. Midwest floods
  • 1 day Oil Slips Further From 2019 Highs On Trade Worries
  • 7 hours European Parliament demands Nord-Stream-ii pipeline to be Stopped
  • 1 day The Political Debacle: Brexit delayed
  • 16 hours Modular Nuclear Reactors
  • 1 day Telsa Sales in Europe
Alt Text

Could China Save The U.S. Coal Industry?

In a somewhat surprising move,…

Alt Text

Coal To Liquid Fuel Could Become Much Cheaper

With coal expected to remain…

Alt Text

India’s Coal Reliance Deepens

Despite significant efforts to boost…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

A Flagship U.S. Coal Project Gets Quashed

Producers in the coal space are desperately looking for answers these days.

Miners are trying to find ways to maintain profitability. In the face of falling prices for most grades of coal globally.

The effects have been particularly strong in the U.S. Where environmental regulations, and abundant mine supply, have conspired to drop local prices to multi-year lows.

And the industry was dealt another blow this week. When a key export project was denied by regulatory authorities, now putting this high-hopes work in jeopardy.

The project is a coal terminal on the Pacific coast of Oregon. Advanced over the past two years by Australia's Ambre Energy--a firm specializing in the coal mining and marketing space.

Ambre had been looking to building the Pacific terminal as a new outlet for U.S. coal production. The concept being to ship coal from Montana and Wyoming westward by train and then river-borne barge. Eventually being loaded onto ships for transport, primarily to Asian consumers.

But the Oregon Department of State Lands said Monday that plan is a no-go. Finding that Ambre hadn't done enough analysis of alternatives to prevent harm to tribal fisheries along the proposed export route.

The state department will therefore deny Ambre permits to build the project. Putting the future of this export route in doubt.

The ruling is particularly interesting as a possible precedent for other coal projects planned on the U.S. west coast. There are currently three export projects in the works--but Ambre's is the most advanced in terms of planning and permitting. This week's ruling may thus suggest developing headwinds to the concept of Pacific coal exports in general.

Ambre has the option to appeal the state decision. But until we see any progress on such a front, the future of this option for U.S. producers should be considered substantially diminished.

Here's to moving it out,

Dave Forest




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News