• 4 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 7 minutes Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 13 minutes NordStream2
  • 17 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 15 hours California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 17 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 3 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 4 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 1 day U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 2 days Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 4 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 4 days Can Technology Keep Coal Plants Alive and Well?
  • 5 days Succession Planning in Human Resources for Vaccinated Individuals in the Oil & Gas Industry
  • 20 hours Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 1 day Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
  • 4 days Storage of gas cylinders
  • 5 days Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
Democrats Divided On Biden’s $3.5 Trillion Green Energy Plan

Democrats Divided On Biden’s $3.5 Trillion Green Energy Plan

Divisions are deepening between Democratic…

Do Lithium Batteries Pose A Major Fire Hazard?

Do Lithium Batteries Pose A Major Fire Hazard?

Following a three-day fire at…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

What Are Anti-Solar Panels?

Solar panels have been hailed as one of the most important energy technologies of our time for their ability to theoretically produce infinite energy. But solar panels only work during the day and even then only if there is enough sun for them to convert into electricity. Well now there is a new kind of panel, and it could well solve that problem.

This new tech is called the anti-solar panel, and it doesn't absorb heat from the sun to turn into electricity. Instead, these panels capture the heat that the earth radiates into the atmosphere at night as it cools off and radiates it out in turn. This radiated heat is then used to produce electricity with a thermoelectric generator.

Thermoelectric generators work by converting heat into electricity using a phenomenon called the Seebeck Effect: a difference in temperature in two different conductors or semiconductors results in a difference between their voltages, creating an electric potential. A team of scientists from Stanford University used this phenomenon to generate 2.2 watts of electricity per square meter of anti-solar panels in a rooftop proof-of-concept.

Now, 2.2 watts from a square meter of panels may not sound like much, but it is important to note that this electricity was produced without, strictly speaking, an external source of energy or a battery. According to the scientists who developed the proof-of-concept, anti-solar panels can be used to light cities during the night at a low cost.

This is not the first anti-solar project, however. Earlier this year, media reported on the work of a University of California – Davis researcher who developed cells that captured the earth's heat and radiated it towards the sky, using the same process of radiative cooling, through which bodies lose heat by emitting infrared radiation.

Related: Iran Ramps Up Production At Supergiant South Pars Gas Field


"A regular solar cell generates power by absorbing sunlight, which causes a voltage to appear across the device and for current to flow. In these new devices, light is instead emitted and the current and voltage go in the opposite direction, but you still generate power," the researcher, Jeremy Munday said in a statement in February. "You have to use different materials, but the physics is the same." What is perhaps even better is that, according to Munday, such panels could be used during the day as well, as long as they were pointed away from the sun. In other words, anti-solar panels could theoretically work around the clock, which would eliminate one of the biggest drawbacks of solar panels: their dependence on the availability of sunlight.

And now the Stanford scientists boast that their anti-solar panel is a lot more effective than older experiments with radiative cooling, capable of producing up to 120 times more energy. Munday, however, reports that his panels could produce 50 watts per square meter.

"This result is significantly higher than the previous reported results and points to the potential applicability of harvesting electrical power at night," they wrote in their paper. And the thermoelectric generator only made up a tiny part of the whole installation, which means it can be easily scalable, they also noted.

Related: Saudi Arabia’s Oil Exports To The U.S. Slump To Lowest Level In Decades

Anti-solar panels can be a great idea for places that have a lot of sunshine, because even without it, there is ambient heat in the atmosphere that can be captured by the panels and radiated as infrared light, to be in turn harnessed by a power generator. However, for now, it is all mostly theoretical.

"We are working to develop high-performance, sustainable lighting generation that can provide everyone - including those in developing and rural areas - access to reliable and sustainable low cost lighting energy sources," the Stanford researchers said.

If the promise of anti-solar technology materializes, it would offer a way around battery-based energy storage that, although costs are falling, is still quite a costly aspect of reliable renewable energy. However, it appears that the applications of anti-solar cells are relatively limited in that both studies mention it as a source of electricity for lighting.

Indeed, the potential of this new technology seems to be limited: even Munday's panels could only generate a quarter of what regular solar panels generate, and, he notes, these solar panels are the result of decades of research and development, while anti-solar technology is a nascent one.

However, if it advances sufficiently, it could add to the renewable evolution of energy: anti-solar panels could be installed at industrial sites and run on the waste heat from industrial processes, producing clean energy and contributing to the much-hyped carbon neutrality of industrial activity. Or they can simply be installed on a rooftop, like regular solar panels, but capable of generating electricity 24/7.

Perhaps it could also be combined with cooling systems like this one, which uses radiative cooling to cool buildings without an external source of energy, and instead of sending the heat collected in the device into space, using it to produce electricity with anti-solar cells.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Kay Uwe Boehm on November 23 2020 said:
    Australia lost already much money investing in USA fracking and with bush fires likely from drought caused by low temperatures over sea reducing vaporisation that way rain on land side but cloud seeding could be helpfull also for fighting against fire like controlled fires.

    Self ignition also from heat and bacterias !

    Water all around in australia sea also for solar desalination and purification between black walls with one angled glass, gutter and blacked water.
    Water always in air out with compressor like scuba divers filling their bottles after fillled opend in room cooling down like aircondition but compressor and bottles going hot needs energy usable also for CO2 turbine with backflow cooling of all thermal isolated usable also with 2. cf compressor sucking hot air cooled with CO2 for condensation and air expanded over turbo cold aircondition with energy surplus from heat difference.

    kayuweboehm@yahoo.de
  • Kay Uwe Boehm on November 23 2020 said:
    10GW peak in FRG about 1GW average backed by gas turbine same 1 nuclear power plant !

    30GWh backup battery enough for 3h 10GW peak or 30h 1GW.

    1 Tesla model 3 about 50kWh means 100.000 about 5GWh.
    1 Tesla model 3 needs about.10kg lithium for 800kg battery
    means 100 000 about 1 kt.

    Australia is main lithium producer in world with about 50kt/a and about 50 years reserves enough for 5 million tesla 3/a from 100 million new cars/a 10% VW AG in world !
    Tesla bancrupcy until middle of 2021 because of VW ID>E ?

    700bar CNG plugin hybrid needs only 1/5 lithium so more can drive electric in world and CNG also.easy makable out of electrolyse H2 + air.CO2 with cold fusion energy shooting mercury into water for Hg H to H punsh fusion optional Hg spallation to Hg-197 epsilon decay Au-197 gold addable CO2 turbines at end with centrifugal.compressor backflow cooling of.all thermal isolated only electricity out !

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News