• 4 minutes Energy Armageddon
  • 6 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 10 minutes Russia Says Europe Will Struggle To Replace Its Oil Products
  • 1 hour GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 1 hour Reality catching up with EV forecasts
  • 1 day Famous author Michael Crichton talks about the "Climate Change Religion" aka Feudalism 2.0
  • 7 days 87,000 new IRS agents, higher taxes, and a massive green energy slush fund... "Here Are The Winners And Losers In The 'Inflation Reduction Act'"-ZeroHedge
  • 12 days A Somewhat Realistic View of the Near Future for Electric Vehicles Worldwide
  • 12 days "Natural Gas Price Fundamental Daily Forecast – Grinding Toward Summer Highs Despite Huge Short Interest" by James Hyerczyk & REUTERS on NatGas
Inflation Reduction Act Is Both Good And Bad News For U.S Biofuels

Inflation Reduction Act Is Both Good And Bad News For U.S Biofuels

Favorable policies are incentivizing the…

Vegetable Oil Is Gaining Traction As A Biofuel

Vegetable Oil Is Gaining Traction As A Biofuel

Interest in biofuels has grown…

Will Bioenergy Ever Be Competitive?

Will Bioenergy Ever Be Competitive?

New research from the Center…

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

Biofuel Production Is Set To Soar In The U.S.

  • Whether or not biofuels are a renewable source of energy has long been a controversial topic, with some environmentalists suggesting the energy source is antithetical to the concept of clean energy.
  • In the U.S., the EPA wants to increase renewable fuels by approximately 9 percent by the end of 2025, representing an overall increase of nearly 2 billion gallons.
  • The EPA believes more biofuels will advance the priorities of energy security, less pollution, and consumer protection, although some environmentalists disagree.

What makes an energy source renewable? This question has been at the center of numerous debates in recent months as government agencies around the world rewrite their energy policies in the wake of the massive energy sector shakeup brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic and pushed into overdrive by Russia’s war in Ukraine. We are currently living through a “global energy crisis of unprecedented depth and complexity,” according to the recently released World Energy Outlook 2022, an annual flagship report from the International Energy Agency (IEA). According to the IEA’s analysis, “there is no going back to the way things were.” The rules of global geopolitics are being rewritten as we speak, and world leaders are scrambling to shore up energy independence and security in the face of a global energy crisis while also advancing clean energy in the face of climate change. In Europe, a debate has unfolded around whether nuclear energy and natural gas can be considered “renewable,” thus making these resources eligible for funding earmarked for climate initiatives. The European Union ultimately decided that under specific circumstances, both nuclear and natural gas could be included under “environmentally sustainable economic activities.” The decision was divisive, provoking an outcry of greenwashing as well as complaints over continued dependence upon the Kremlin for natural gas imports to the bloc.

On the other side of the Atlantic, a similar debate is heating up, but in this case, the crux of the issue is the cleanness and greenness of biofuels. While this is not a new debate in the United States, it’s become increasingly relevant as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed new standards for how much of the nation’s fuel supply should come from renewable sources including controversial biofuels and biogases. 

Related: Black Sea Shipping Rates Jump 20%

ADVERTISEMENT

The EPA’s proposal, released in December, includes an increase in Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) quotas, which require certain levels of biofuels (such as products like corn-based ethanol, manure-based biogas, and wood pellets) in the national fuel mix to supplement petroleum-based fossil fuels. “Renewable fuel” is a catch-all term used by the government to encompass “fuel produced from planted crops, planted trees, animal waste and byproducts, and wood debris from non-ecological sensitive areas and not from federal forestland,” according to a summation from Grist. 

The new EPA proposal dictates that renewable fuels would increase by approximately 9 percent by the end of 2025, representing an overall increase of nearly 2 billion gallons. All told, the EPA aims to achieve the use of over 22 billion gallons of different renewable fuel sources in the national energy mix by 2025. 15 billion of those gallons would come from corn-based ethanol alone. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Proponents of the measure say that it will help ease the volatility of energy markets in the coming years as the world tries to decarbonize rapidly enough to meet international goals including the Paris agreement. In a press release, the EPA stated that the proposal “seeks to advance the priorities of energy security, less pollution, and consumer protection.” Environmentalists, however, say that this move will have devastating environmental impacts which are antithetical to the goal of greening the energy industry.

Industrial biomass production such as corn and wood pellet production are drivers of serious environmental harm including deforestation, water pollution, and the creation of toxic dead zones across the country and the Gulf of Mexico thanks to the heavy use of pesticides. “Relying on dirty fuels like factory farm gas and ethanol to clean up our transportation sector will only dig a deeper hole,” Tarah Heinzen, legal director for the non-profit environmental watchdog group Food & Water Watch told Grist. “The EPA should recognize this by reducing, not increasing, the volume requirements for these dirty sources of energy in the Renewable Fuel Standard.” 

Despite the outcry from environmentalists, the outlook is very positive for those in the ‘renewable fuel’ industry. The International Energy Agency predicts that total global biofuel demand will increase more than 20 percent from its 2020 levels by 2027. 

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT



Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 10 2023 said:
    Whether corn-based ethanol is a renewable source of energy or not is irrelevant. What is absolutely more relevant is that the millions of tons of corn produced in the US State of Iowa be used to supplement food supplies around the world rather than being used as a biofuel whose environmental credentials are highly questionable and whose emission reduction is minute. The switch to food production is very essential at a time of an unprecedented global energy crisis which has sent food prices soaring and is threatening global shortages and inevitable starvation in many parts of the world.

    The same logic applies to Brazil whose continuous clearing of millions of acres in the Amazon rain forests to grow sugar cane solely for the production of ethanol is very adversely harming the environment. If, however, the clearing is going to continue, then let the cleared areas be used to supplement global food production rather than producing ethanol.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News