WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

Sub-$50 Oil Could Kill Shale

Oil prices have returned to…

Alt Text

Will Shell’s Gas Gamble Pay Off?

Shell has taken a big…

Alt Text

The Single Biggest Player In The Electric Car Market

The announcement from China last…

IEA: OPEC Must Extend Cuts To Balance Oil Markets

OPEC

U.S. shale is poised to outlast OPEC.

It has long been the suspicion of many oil market analysts that the U.S. shale industry was likely too nimble for OPEC to really hammer it into oblivion. That proved to be the case after two years of low prices – shale production came off from peak levels, but held up through 2016.

That was long enough to force OPEC’s hand. The deal that OPEC put in place late last year, taking a combined 1.8 million barrels per day (mb/d) off the market, really took the pressure off of shale producers. OPEC decided that it would sacrifice some production in order to boost revenues through higher prices. That threw a lifeline to shale producers, and shale output has made a swift comeback since last year.

Now, there is a growing expectation that OPEC can’t keep its cuts going. The OPEC/non-OPEC coalition had hoped that the market would have balanced after six months of cuts, but they were forced to agree to a nine-month extension through the end of the first quarter of 2018. Few analysts, at this point, see the extension as sufficient, which raises the question of what happens after March of next year.

If OPEC really wants to balance the oil market, they would have to keep the cuts in place through 2018 at least. “They’re going to have to dig in for the long haul,” Neil Atkinson, head of the IEA’s oil markets and industry division, told Bloomberg TV. “Re-balancing is a stubborn process.” Related: Shale Producers Hedge At Much Lower Prices

The latest IEA report shows that OPEC’s current production at 32.8 mb/d is higher than what the “call on OPEC” – the implied demand for OPEC’s oil – for next year. In other words, the global market will be oversupplied next year given the current figures.

“If OPEC wants to keep oil prices in the $50s and hit $60, the organization will have to keep a lid on supply for several more years,” Sarah Emerson, energy principal at ESAI, told Bloomberg.

But, that just does not seem to be in the cards. The original six-month deal was relatively painless for a lot of OPEC members, save Saudi Arabia, who took on the lion’s share of the reductions. Some of the participants, such as Venezuela and Mexico (a non-OPEC member), are suffering from declining production anyway. Countries like Russia tend to see their output dip in the winter. Iraq and the UAE did not even fully comply with the deal. Iran was allowed to increase from its baseline, and Nigeria and Libya were exempted entirely.

However, the nine-month extension is a trickier proposition. Russia and Saudi Arabia see their production rise in summer months, which means the cuts are much more painful. More importantly, many predicted that compliance would falter as time goes on. Recent data suggests the group’s resolve is fraying – OPEC’s production in July rose to its highest point in 2017.

Even if they can hold things together until March 2018, there are much lower odds that they will extend again.

“In the end, the markets are going to win and it’s going to be shale,” Citi’s Ed Morse told Bloomberg TV. “The OPEC position, even with Russia, is really not sustainable over a long period of time. They are losing revenue by doing what they have done. Yes, they may be having a little bit higher revenue than they otherwise might have. But, you’ve got the prices up, you’ve got the U.S. producers hedging through 2017 now, pretty much into 2018, and they can survive at a lower price. So they’re going to win.”

Morse also dismissed recent concerns over the Permian, where companies like Pioneer Natural Resources reported higher gas-to-oil ratios in their production, suggesting wells are performing worse than expected. Morse said this is a “hiccup” and a “temporary problem,” and that the Permian will grow “at a hefty rate this year and probably the same rate next year.”

If this turns out to be true and U.S. shale doesn’t miss a beat, then production will grow substantially, up to almost 10 mb/d, according to EIA estimates. If that is the case, OPEC might throw in the towel next year and return to full production, at which point, prices could very well crash again. Related: Barclays: Oil Prices To Drop This Quarter

While many will claim this is a “win” for shale, this will be cold comfort to actual shale drillers that will once again have to suffer through another bout of low prices.

“We expect the total liquids balance to return to a more pronounced surplus over 2018, bringing with it a return to stock builds and a firm lid on prices,” JBC Energy wrote in a recent note.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • James on August 15 2017 said:
    Some high power, perhaps POTUS needs to step up and put a production cap on these greedy shale producers, they are only causing the inevitable by overproducing in a very volatile market.
  • Crazy Uncle on August 15 2017 said:
    How exactly is this a win for shale companies. Borrowing money today to sell oil at lower prices in 2018? It's been a disaster for the equity holders and many bond holders.
  • Mathew G on August 15 2017 said:
    I feel that further oil cuts by OPEC do not prove anything to the oil price as long as shale and US can meet the shortcomings. Infact it will make the shale producers gain that market share. Money now has more value than money at a later date. So now decide who will loose?
  • Toby on August 17 2017 said:
    Shale ought to be strategic reserve only. We are burning through our reserves to prevent terrorists & Russia from profiting off higher oil prices. It'd be nice if there were another way.
  • Ben on August 29 2017 said:
    Toby, I did not realize this land and prodcts belonged to the "state", good point Comrade, we should stop individuals from earning profits from their property. Maybe the government should take stock from Apple, Google and Amazon shareholders to give to these people so it's fair. RIGHT, LIBERALISM a mental disorder.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News