• 2 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 2 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 7 hours Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 8 hours OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 24 hours U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 1 day Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 1 day Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 1 day EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 1 day Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 1 day Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 7 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
Alt Text

This OPEC Strategy Could Boost Uranium Prices Next Year

Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium…

Alt Text

Russia’s Nuclear Sector Is Surging

With a long-standing nuclear tradition,…

Alt Text

Rising Costs Slow The Growth Of Nuclear Power

High costs and public fears…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

South Korea - Most Dangerous Nuclear Center on the Planet

While the world seems to have overlooked the consequences of the 11 March 2011 debacle at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi six reactor nuclear power plant (NPP) complex, the fact remains that the global nuclear power industry continues to suffer from several threats unknown to more conventional power stations.

These include unpredictable natural phenomena, such as the earthquake and subsequent tsunami that destroyed Fukushima Daiichi NPP last year.

A second concern is the failure of nuclear technology, as evidenced by the 1979 partial meltdown at the U.S. NPP Three Mile Island.

Last but hardly least is human error, epitomized by the 1986 catastrophe at the USSR’s Chernobyl NPP.

But South Korea’s nuclear power industry faces a fourth element of uncertainty – across its northern Demilitarized Zone border is a xenophobic, failing regime armed with an arsenal of missiles and, apparently now, nuclear weapons as well.

Lest this sound too alarmist, it is worth remembering that the Korean War was ended not by a peace treaty, but an armistice, signed in July 1953, 59 years ago.

Accordingly, South Korea’s 23 nuclear reactors, which supply roughly 35 percent of the nation’s total electricity needs, lie in a potential war zone.

Seoul’s reaction? It plans to build an additional 16 reactors by 2030.

Energy-starved East Asia fervently embraced U.S. President Eisenhower’s 1953 “Atoms for Peace” initiative, with the result that Japan built since early 1960s 50 functioning reactors, all of which two have been mothballed since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi catastrophe. Nuclear power provided roughly a third of Japan’s electricity before the March 2011 “incident,” and the Japanese government had planned to increase nuclear energy power’s share to 50 percent before Fukushima.

Related Article: Nuclear Waste: A Valuable Source of Energy

South Korea entered the nuclear power industry later than Japan, with the nation’s oldest NPP Gori being built in 1978 near Busan.

Aside from the overhanging North Korean threat, problems? In February the Gori NPP, briefly lost electrical power and the emergency generator failed to start.

In July the 1,000-megawatt NPP at Yeonggwang, 156 miles south of Seoul, went into automatic shutdown after a malfunction.

More recently, earlier this month both South Korea’s Yeonggwang NPP, on the country’s southwest coast and the Shingori NPP, which came online last year, located on the country’s southeast coast, were shut down on 2 October, both as a result of unrelated systems malfunctions.

No problem, according to state-run Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power spokesman, who told the press, "There is no correlation between the two incidents.” As for the Shingori reactor near Busan, "There was a malfunction in the reactor's control rod, but the reactor is now stable with no danger of a radiation leak."


In May, five GORI NPP senior engineers were charged with trying to cover up the February Gori power failure, including a 55 year-old chief engineer, charged with violating a law on nuclear safety during the “incident.”

And where will the fuel for South Korea’s NPP come from?

Related Article: Confidence in Nuclear Power is on the Rise Again

Washington’s concerns about global proliferation are increasingly irritating South Korean officials, who believe that the United States is likely to try to forbid them from enriching uranium, because in recent discreet talks the U.S. has disregarded Seoul’s efforts to amend the contentious U.S.-South Korea Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, which expires in March 2014.

Last but hardly least, to highlight the schizophrenic current state  of relations between Seoul and Washington, following threats of nuclear retaliation from North Korea, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak has instructed his military to intensify programs to deploy new missiles after a U.S.-imposed limit on their range was lifted and Washington agreed to an arrangement nearly tripling the maximum allowable range of South Korea's intermediate range ballistic missiles, meaning they could strike all of North Korea and portions of China.

Hardly a diplomatic move lessening the tensions on the Korean peninsula.

So, the world, having experienced a number of indigenous nuclear power debacles in the last 33 years, may yet have a front row seat for a military attack on NPPs.

Hooray for diplomacy. Unless more South Korean NPPs technicians screw up first.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • David B. Benson on October 16 2012 said:
    It would be helpful if John Daly would actaully learn something about nuclear power plants before commenting about these generators.

    For starters, TMI was a result of operator error, similar to the later Chernobyl but with much less disasterous consequences.
  • Jerry on February 06 2013 said:
    This is why the threats from North Korea, while disturbing, are even more bizarre. An attack on the South, including the nuclear power plants, would create a zone of contamination and mayhem far into their own country, riddling them and their descendants with cancer, starvation, and sickness for decades, if not hundreds of years. It would give new meaning to the term Pyrrhic victory.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News