• 2 minutes Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 4 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 7 minutes Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 18 hours Tesla Begins Construction Of World’s Largest Energy Storage Facility
  • 16 hours Joe Biden the "Archie Bunker" of the left selects Kamala Harris for VP . . . . . . Does she help the campaign ?
  • 14 hours Will any journalist have the balls to ask Kamala if she supports Wall Street "Carried Interest" Tax Loophole
  • 2 days Trump Hands Putin Major Geopolitical Victory
  • 2 hours America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 2 hours Buying votes is cool now.
  • 4 hours In 1,267 days, Trump has made 20,055 false or misleading claims
  • 2 days Those Nasty White People and Camping Racism
  • 1 hour Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 1 day .
  • 1 day The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 1 day COVID&life and Vicious Circle: "Working From Home Is Not Panacea For Virus"
  • 2 hours China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 1 day The World is Facing a Solar Panel Waste Problem
  • 2 days Oil Tanker Runs Aground in Mauritius - Oil Spill
Controversial Nuclear Plant In Belarus Nears Completion

Controversial Nuclear Plant In Belarus Nears Completion

Belarus’ controversial Russian-built nuclear power…

Al Fin

Al Fin

Al Fin runs a number of very successful blogs that cover, energy, technology, news and politics.

More Info

Premium Content

Nuclear Waste: A Valuable Source of Energy

Next week in Toronto, nuclear scientists and government functionaries from around the world will gather to talk about different ways to bury nuclear waste deep underground, inaccessible to ordinary human activity.

But a retired Canadian professor of biophysics is trying to bring thinking on ordinary nuclear waste into the 21st century. Nuclear "waste" is not dangerous garbage, UT professor emeritus Peter Ottensmeyer asserts. Instead, it is a valuable source of vast and useful energy -- 134 times the amount of energy that was derived from nuclear fuel before it officially became "waste."

The U238 that makes up most of the uranium [in nuclear fuel] is not split, and not used, although the reaction does cause it to morph into heavier elements, including plutonium. The process leaves a residue of highly radioactive materials that emit harmful radiation for 400,000 years.

Keeping this waste safe is the problem that now confronts the nuclear industry.

Ottensmeyer argues that this waste fuel needn’t be treated as waste.

The heavier atoms it contains can indeed be split by the fast-moving neutrons.

But they have to be kept moving fast by using a different coolant or moderator in the reactor.

Sodium or a mixture of the heavy metals lead and bismuth work admirably, he says. The denser moderator keeps the neutrons bouncing around at high speeds, instead of slowing down, as neutrons in water-moderated reactors do.

Harnessing those fast neutrons, and using them to split the bigger, heavier products of nuclear reactors – such as the plutonium that could be used to make nuclear weapons – makes sense, he argues.

In fact, there’s potential to get 134 times more energy from what is now simply discarded as used fuel. He estimates the value of the potential electricity to be in the trillions of dollars.

Moreover, he says, some of the atoms that are split are transformed into valuable platinum group metals.

There’s also a big payoff in decreasing the radioactivity of the spent fuel, once the fast reactor has run its course. Fuel from the fast neutron reactor decays to the level of natural uranium in less than 300 years, says Ottensmeyer.

It also provides a peaceful use for the plutonium now used in nuclear weapons.

GE and Hitachi are currently developing a sodium-moderated fast neutron reactor, the Prism. They’re pitching it to the U.K. as a method of using its excess plutonium. _The Star

Many people who call themselves "environmentalists" appear to be clueless regarding the vast potential of nuclear power to provide abundant, affordable, safe, and clean energy on a large scale. Many of these so-called "environmentalists" are even attempting to shut down all forms of nuclear power altogether. Oddly enough, many of these people are also in favour of a massive implementation of big wind and big solar power -- the exorbitantly expensive intermittent unreliables -- deadly hazards to finely balanced power grids.

Whether in government or outside of government, these anti-nuclear / pro-intermittent unreliables are clearly faux environmentalists, and foes of the Earth's natural environment. Their policies will lead to massive global poverty with its concomitant subsistence-level destruction of the environment through deforestation, over-fishing, and the inevitable toxic waste that comes from the more primitive technologies of collapsing societies and civilisations.

By. Al Fin


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mel Tisdale on October 06 2012 said:
    "Whether in government or outside of government, these anti-nuclear / pro-intermittent unreliables are clearly faux environmentalists, and foes of the Earth's natural environment." Well said, sir!

    If only the Greens would just shut up for a few years, we might, just might, be able to save the planet.
  • George Arnold on October 23 2012 said:
    Trivializing the unknown challenges and risks of safeguarding high-level nuclear waste for even 300 years is irresponsible even by the low standards of industry puffery. Going back to the 1950s in the real world, no-one has been able to develop and test a liquid-metal reactor that can operate safely. Search on 'Simi Valley nuclear accident' for starters.
    The bottom line is that nuclear power is neither clean, green, nor environmentally responsible. There is no energy production without enriched fuel, and there is no enrichment without the consumption of large quantities of coal-fired electricity. And, since a reactor's fuel rods become 'waste' after the release of such a small portion of the energy in the enriched fuel (1/134th part, according to author Al Fin) it's questionable that nuclear power can safely produce net positive energy in any configuration. It's the definition of a losing proposition. We can do better with the renewable sources Al Fin hates (BTW, Al, not all of them are intermittent.)
  • SA Kiteman on November 08 2012 said:
    Molten Salt Fast Reactors are another option to molten metal fast reactors, and the coolant is typically much more stabile from a chemical standpoint. Wrap a molten thoriated salt blanket around it and you can breed U233, a great fuel for LFTRs.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News