• 5 minutes Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 10 minutes Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 15 minutes U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 5 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 2 hours Censorship has a price: Google’s CEO Defends Potential Return to China
  • 3 hours Gold price on a rise...
  • 4 hours Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 3 hours Two Koreas: U.N. Command Wrap Up First Talks On Disarming Border
  • 2 hours $70 More Likely Than $100 - YeeeeeeHaaaaa
  • 17 mins Porsche Says That it ‘Enters the Electric Era With The New Taycan’
  • 30 mins Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 11 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 32 mins UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 4 hours Who's Ready For The Next Contest?
  • 10 mins Saudi Crown Prince to Trump: We've Replaced All Iran's Lost Oil
  • 32 mins Mexico State Oil
Alt Text

An Unexpected Carbon Tax Proposal

Dyed-in-the-wool, rock-ribbed Republicans have proposed…

Alt Text

Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Set New Record

The average concentration of atmospheric…

Alt Text

Oil Majors See Profit In Carbon Capture And Storage

carbon capture and storage technology…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

UN Puts $2.4 Trillion Annual Price Tag On Mitigating Climate Change

UN

Climate scientists are not known for giving good news, and the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that convened in South Korea was no exception: the scientists that compiled a special report on the climate situation on the planet slapped optimists in the face: the world needs to spend US$2.4 trillion every year until 2035 to slow down the effects of climate change.

Perhaps shockingly, the panel noted that at the current warming rates, Earth’s atmosphere will in less than one hundred years be 3 degrees Celsius warmer than it was before the start of the Industrial revolution, which is twice what the Paris Agreement stipulated in one of its scenarios. No wonder that the panel is calling for following the 1.5-degree scenario instead of the 2-degree one, which was widely seen as more realistic. Realistic or not, apparently, the world needs to work towards a temperature climb reduction of 1.5 degrees, the panel says.

The 1.5-degree scenario will require cutting CO2 emissions by as much as 45 percent over the 20-year period from 2010 to 2030 and to a net zero by 2050—net zero meaning that all CO2 released will need to be captured and stored or reused. But that’s just one aspect of the seismic shift that humankind would have to affect to curb the temperature rise.

Another aspect would be the phase-out of coal and a reduction in the amount of natural gas used for power generation. To some observers unburdened by excessive planetary anxiety, this would probably sound ridiculous: natural gas has emerged as the lesser evil compared with coal and oil, the so-called bridge fuel to a future powered entirely by renewable sources. To get a sense of how easy that would be, here’s the 2017 statistics from IEA’s World Energy Outlook as quoted by Bloomberg: coal accounted for 37 percent of global power generation, which made it the largest single source of electricity. To compare, renewables accounted for 24 percent, as much as natural gas, and that included hydropower.

How do you go from 37 percent to zero in less than 20 years? That’s a question that has a simple answer: only with tons of money and a lot of determination. Yet, Bloomberg New Energy Finance estimated that last year, the total spent on renewable energy came in at US$333.5 billion. The US$2.4 trillion that the climate change panel has calculated as necessary investments is almost seven times more than that. Who can afford it?

Unfortunately, it seems that those who said we’re already too late in saving the planet from the effects of climate change were right. It is theoretically possible to increase investments in renewable energy sevenfold and accelerate the phase-out of coal. It is also theoretically possible to transform the world’s energy networks in a way that supports a lot more use of renewable energy and millions of electric vehicles, which means making space for a lot of energy storage. But then, a lot of things are theoretically possible but remain at the theoretical level simply because there are way too many constraints to make the jump to practical.

The authors of the IPCC report admit as much. “These options are technically proven at various scales, but their large-scale deployment may be limited by economic, financial, human capacity and institutional constraints,” the report said. “We provide a manual of solutions. It’s up to them to use this manual, considering the constraints or opportunities existing in different countries. It’s their decision, but we provide the scientific information,” the chairman of the IPCC, Hoesung Lee, told Bloomberg. We shall wait and see how much of the world takes up the challenge.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Peter Robert Breedveld on October 09 2018 said:
    These UN guys are totally out of touch. The United States is going to pull out of the Paris Accord and if the very popular Jair Bolsonaro wins the run off election so will Brazil.
  • Atul Thakur on October 10 2018 said:
    Is not Global warming contributed by the human population explosion ? Make an effort to reduce the human population and Global warming will not happen. Talk to the Islamic countries to reduce their population and Global warming will be solved.
  • Jeffrey Pickett on October 10 2018 said:
    Nothing about the Grand Solar Minimum or that Al Gore said that the Artic would be ice free by now or that China can remain, by far, the #1 polluter with #2 India long after the latest extended cataclysmic end of the world time has run out. First the UN despots want more money as they and the central bankers can't seem to get enough and population control, China "cultural Marxism" style was promised the reigns of the New World Order. Oh well they can create a new Bit Coin out of thin air and watch all the fools rush in to vote themselves into economic slavery. It's amazing what passes for a college degree these days.
  • cowboybob on October 10 2018 said:
    P.T. Barnum would be proud of this...the biggest shakedown in the history of mankind. Please quit promoting this insanity in search of website clicks...there are more intellectual issues to report on.
  • Lee James on October 11 2018 said:
    Reader comments seem to suggest that the estimated price tag is a bit on the inconvenient side.

    How about half as much -- say, 1.2 T?
  • Bill Simpson on October 14 2018 said:
    Nothing will get done. It is already far too late to prevent massive disruption caused by a warming atmosphere. Way too much carbon dioxide has already entered the atmosphere, too rapidly, to stop what is coming.
    Trying to stop it would only cause greater suffering by collapsing the banking system from bad debts resulting from an economy forced to contract by an energy shortage.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News