• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 3 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 20 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 2 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 8 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 1 hour Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 13 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 12 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 8 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 1 hour WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 22 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 12 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 21 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 14 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller

WoodMac Warns Half Of Big Oil Output May Be Hit By Carbon Costs

Upstream industry

As much as up to 50 percent of the production of oil majors could be hit by carbon costs in the next ten years if legislators that currently price carbon extend the policy to the upstream sector, Wood Mackenzie said in a new report on how oil majors would respond to the global energy transition and rising pressure for low-carbon energy.

Wood Mackenzie has identified three main risks that the majors would be facing with the global drive to switch from fossil fuels to low-carbon energy: the growth in the renewables industry, intensified carbon policy, and growing low-carbon competition.

The energy consultancy predicts that demand for coal and oil could peak well ahead of 2035, while natural gas and zero-carbon fuels would meet at least 60 percent of the rise in the world’s energy demand until 2035.

“As carbon policy intensifies, the oil and gas Majors will face more regulatory burden and are likely to face increasing costs. Green financing could also mean higher cost of capital for more carbon-intensive oil assets such as oil sands, as investors shift to alternative fuels and lower-carbon technologies,” according to Paul McConnell, research director of global trends for Wood Mackenzie.

All majors have factored in a price on carbon in their long-term strategies, but the question is, how much risk have the companies accounted for in their forecasts, McConnell noted. Timeline, geography and prices vary enormously, with a price on carbon of between US$6 to US$80 a ton, he added.

Big Oil is facing pressure to diversify, but diversification into renewables would be challenging, Wood Mackenzie reckons. However, the oil and gas groups’ biggest risk would be not to do anything, “and be left exposed to investors making their own minds up,” the consultancy said.

“Global carbon risks could depress oil prices for the long term with slowing demand and an increase in costs, making it crucial for the Majors to push break-evens down further,” McConnell noted.

Earlier this month, Wood Mackenzie suggested that oil majors would have to hack off some US$370 billion from their total costs this year and next, which would result in a production decline of around 3 percent this year and 4 percent next year.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Oilracle on November 19 2016 said:
    Isn't the USA just about to end this imposed idiocy?!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News