• 3 minutes Biden Seeks $2 Trillion Clean Energy And Infrastructure Spending Boost
  • 5 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 8 minutes Gazprom fails to exempt Nord Stream-2 from EU market rules
  • 3 mins China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 4 hours Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 7 hours The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 6 hours China's impending economic meltdown
  • 9 hours Why Oil could hit $100
  • 24 hours The World is Facing a Solar Panel Waste Problem
  • 4 hours Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 16 hours Pompeo upsets China; oil & gas prices to fall
  • 12 hours Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 7 hours Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 2 days Sell Natural Gas Benefits to Grow the Market!
  • 3 days The Core Issue Of US Chaos..Finally disclosed
  • 1 day Trump Suggests Delaying Election Amid Fraud Claims
  • 2 days Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
Energy Giants Race For 'Green Hydrogen' Market Share

Energy Giants Race For 'Green Hydrogen' Market Share

Renewables-minded utilities and big oil…

COVID-19 Is Causing The GCC To Crumble

COVID-19 Is Causing The GCC To Crumble

The 39-year-old Gulf Cooperation Council…

Why Trafigura Just Set Its Short-Term Price Target For Oil At $50

Crude oil could decline to $50 a barrel under the double weight of geopolitical concerns and rising production in the United States. That’s according to the co-head of global oil trading at Trafigura, who spoke to Bloomberg.

“I can see us drifting toward $50 in the short term, but I think the medium to long term price is $70 to $75,” Ben Luckock said, adding “We don’t think the current level of OPEC cuts and compliance is actually enough to make oil go higher.”

It seems OPEC doesn’t think the current cuts are deep enough, either. That’s saying a lot because the current cuts are actually deeper than OPEC+ agreed them to be in December, mainly because of the continued drop in Venezuelan production. In July, for example, OPEC said its compliance rate with the cuts had reached 159 percent. Judging by price movements, even this has proven insufficient to calm global economic growth fears amid the U.S.-China trade war and oversupply worries caused by the relentless rise in U.S. shale output.

There’s more bad news for OPEC, too. Bloomberg reports Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. have estimated that the cartel and its partners would need to deepen the cuts by as much as 1 million bpd next year to keep Brent around the $60 mark as U.S. production continues to grow.

Yet according to Trafigura’s Luckock, falling prices would take care of that: the lower price at which oil trades, the less money U.S. shale drillers have to put into new production. So when the price falls, they would curb spending and production growth will slow down. There have already been calls for that from shareholders and from Continental Resources’ Harold Hamm, who a couple of years ago warned his peers that they are drilling themselves into oblivion.

OPEC+ is meeting later this week to discuss the market situation.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News