• 4 minutes China goes against US natural gas
  • 12 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 15 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 46 mins Downloadable 3D Printed Gun Designs, Yay or Nay?
  • 52 mins Peak Oil is Now!
  • 5 hours Rattling With Weapons: Iran Must Develop Military To Guard Against Other Powers
  • 7 hours Russians hacking vs U.S., Microsoft President: Russians Targeting All Political Sides
  • 3 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 13 hours VW Receives Massive Order Of 1,600 All-Electric Trucks
  • 21 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 1 day CO2 Emissions Hit 67-Year Low In USA, As Rest-Of-World Rises
  • 1 day The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 1 day Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 18 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 1 day The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 1 day Starvation, horror in Venezuela
Crude-By-Rail Could Save The Permian Boom

Crude-By-Rail Could Save The Permian Boom

Crude-by-Rail (CBR) has been a…

The $80 Billion Megaproject Splurge In Oil

The $80 Billion Megaproject Splurge In Oil

The growing lineup of megaprojects…

Why Large Banks Shouldn't be Broken Up

The logic of cutting down huge institutions could mean splitting the largest ones into several pieces. Yet banks do not always come in easily divisible parts. Such a move could amount to eradicating the largest banks rather than splitting them up — and eradication is both politically unlikely and potentially disastrous for the economy. In short, if the resulting parts of a divided bank cannot turn a profit, the split-up may prompt the very bailout it was trying to avoid.

Another fear is that American money market operations would move to larger foreign banks, which would have a newly found competitive advantage. If a financial problem arose, we would either bail out the foreign banks or rely on a foreign central bank to protect our own interests. Neither option seems appealing.

Even if a breakup went well, the incentives for the new, smaller banks would be unhealthy. Those banks could make mistakes or take on bad risks without being punished very much in terms of capitalization or revenue, because of their legally capped size. Even if they made big mistakes, these banks would probably be pushing on the frontier of maximum allowed growth. Eventually, the competitive process would cease to make these banks tougher or smarter or leaner, and we would just be cultivating another kind of banking system where bad or irresponsible decisions don’t lead to financial failure.

For the full article click here.



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • OzHouse Alt News on February 14 2012 said:
    There is only one split that matters - splitting gambling banks from deposit banks. This way when the gambling bank goes bust it will not take down everyone else's money.

    http://ozhouse.org

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News