• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 12 hours US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 9 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 20 hours Petrol versus EV
  • 9 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 4 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 14 hours OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 11 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 16 hours 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
  • 9 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 1 day E-mopeds
  • 12 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 15 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 1 day These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
South Korea Cuts Iran Oil Imports To Zero

South Korea Cuts Iran Oil Imports To Zero

U.S. ally South Korea has…

Oil Markets Tremble As Chinese Stocks Crash

Oil Markets Tremble As Chinese Stocks Crash

The steep plunge in Chinese…

Why Large Banks Shouldn't be Broken Up

The logic of cutting down huge institutions could mean splitting the largest ones into several pieces. Yet banks do not always come in easily divisible parts. Such a move could amount to eradicating the largest banks rather than splitting them up — and eradication is both politically unlikely and potentially disastrous for the economy. In short, if the resulting parts of a divided bank cannot turn a profit, the split-up may prompt the very bailout it was trying to avoid.

Another fear is that American money market operations would move to larger foreign banks, which would have a newly found competitive advantage. If a financial problem arose, we would either bail out the foreign banks or rely on a foreign central bank to protect our own interests. Neither option seems appealing.

Even if a breakup went well, the incentives for the new, smaller banks would be unhealthy. Those banks could make mistakes or take on bad risks without being punished very much in terms of capitalization or revenue, because of their legally capped size. Even if they made big mistakes, these banks would probably be pushing on the frontier of maximum allowed growth. Eventually, the competitive process would cease to make these banks tougher or smarter or leaner, and we would just be cultivating another kind of banking system where bad or irresponsible decisions don’t lead to financial failure.

For the full article click here.


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • OzHouse Alt News on February 14 2012 said:
    There is only one split that matters - splitting gambling banks from deposit banks. This way when the gambling bank goes bust it will not take down everyone else's money.

    http://ozhouse.org

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News