• 5 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 7 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 12 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 15 minutes ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 5 hours Canada Election Deadlock?
  • 39 mins Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?
  • 9 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 18 hours Here's your favourite girl, Tom!
  • 9 hours Clampdown on Chinese capital flight is shutting down their commercial construction in US
  • 2 hours China & Coal: China's 2019 coal imports set to rise more than 10%: analysts
  • 23 hours Peaceful demonstration in Hong Kong again thwarted by brutality of police
  • 17 hours IMO 2020:
  • 8 hours Nigeria Demands $62B from Oil Majors
  • 7 hours Devaluing the Yuan
  • 1 day China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 1 day Deepwater GOM Project Claims Industry First
  • 7 hours Fareed Zakaria: Canary in the Coal Mine (U.S. Dollar Hegemony)
Iran Claims To Have Video Evidence Of Oil Tanker Attacks

Iran Claims To Have Video Evidence Of Oil Tanker Attacks

An Iranian National Security official…

Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?

Is Eating Meat Worse Than Burning Oil?

The fight against climate change…

US Slaps Sanctions On Iranian Central Bank—What’s Next?

Tehran

The United States on Friday has taken the first step in its response to the attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure by imposing more sanctions on Iran, but the response might not stop there.

The latest round of sanctions targets the Central Bank of Iran, the National Development Fund of Iran, and Etemad Tejarate Pars Co, which the United States alleges has hidden money transfers that have been used to purchase military equipment, according to a Friday statement by the U.S. Treasury Department.

The sanctions add to the already crippling sanctions on the Middle Eastern country that has stripped Iran of its oil income by drying up most of its buyers, “denying Iran the wealth to create their terror campaign around the world,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in August.

 “Attacking other nations and disrupting the global economy has a price. The regime must be held accountable through diplomatic isolation and economic pressure.” Pompeo said over Twitter on Friday.

But diplomatic isolation and economic pressure are not the only responses that the United States is considering. Pentagon officials, sources say as reported by Foreignpolicy.com, are expected to present President Donald Trump with military options in a Friday meeting, as there hasn’t been a consensus so far about just how far the United States should go in its response to Iran.

Sources have said that some of the options being recommended are covert in nature, and likely include a cyberattack or some form of electronic warfare, followed by diplomatic efforts that could take place at the UN General assembly next week, a senior official has said. The Pentagon officials’ recommendations are thought to be more measured than options the State Department favors, such as a strike or more boots on the ground in the Middle East.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads from Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on September 21 2019 said:
    US sanctions on Iran have so far failed to adversely affect Iran’s oil exports with China for one reported to have raised its imports of Iranian crude from 690,000 barrels a day (b/d) to 1.2 million barrels a day (mbd) in August. Therefore, imposing sanctions on Iran’s Central Bank will not fare better.

    The United States has no shred of evidence that Iran was behind the attack on Aramco’s oil infrastructure. Moreover, it realizes that even a small symbolic strike against Iran will mean war and this will mean in broader terms the end of US national interests in the whole Middle East. It could also mean the destruction of Saudi major oil facilities and the risk that thousands of US troops inside the US Embassy in Baghdad and in Deir ez-Zur in Syria could be taken hostages or killed. In addition, US naval assets including Aircraft Carries could be within range of Iranian missiles.

    As a result, oil prices could surge to $140 a barrel impacting adversely on the US economy and costing President Trump the 2020 presidential elections.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play