• 4 minutes Trump will meet with executives in the energy industry to discuss the impact of COVID-19
  • 8 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 11 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 13 minutes Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 23 mins US Shale Resilience: Oil Industry Experts Say Shale Will Rise Again
  • 4 hours Marine based energy generation
  • 13 hours What If ‘We’d Adopted A More Conventional Response To This Epidemic?’
  • 1 hour While China was covering up Covid-19 it went on an international buying spree for ventilators and masks. From Jan 7th until the end of February China bought 2.2 Billion masks !
  • 3 hours China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 3 hours Real Death Toll In CCP Virus May Be 12X Official Toll
  • 21 hours Trafigura CEO Weir says, "We will see 30% to 35% drop in demand". That amounts to 35mm bbls/day glut ! OPEC+ 10 mm cut won't fix it. It's a DEMAND problem.
  • 24 hours The Most Annoying Person You Have Encountered During Lockdown
  • 1 hour Which producers will shut in first?
  • 9 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 22 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 1 day Cpt Lauren Dowsett

Breaking News:

This Emerging Economy Bets Big On Solar

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

US Company Uses Fracking Technique to Extract Uranium

US Company Uses Fracking Technique to Extract Uranium

The US is obsessed with achieving energy independence and reducing its reliance on foreign oil, yet Amir Adnani, the CEO of Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) in Texas, has stated that “the U.S. is more reliant upon foreign sources of uranium than on foreign sources of oil.”

In the 1980s the US was the largest producer of uranium in the world, with a total output of 43 million pounds a year, easily enough to meet the demands of their nuclear reactors, however now the US only produces 4 million pounds a year.

Russia has been its biggest supplier for the past 20 years, but this year the $8 billion Megatons to Megawatts Program, which extracted uranium from old nuclear weapons, comes to an end. Other countries such as Kazakhstan, Canada, and Australia can supply the US with its needs, but China’s huge expansion plans in the nuclear sector mean that it will soon compete with the US for the limited uranium supplies.

Related Article: Massive Growth in Wastewater from Fracking Industry

UEC has announced that they can produce uranium in the US via a technique that is almost identical to fracking.

Wells are drilled into layers of highly porous rock that contain uranium and ground water. Oxygenated water is then injected into the well which dissolves the uranium. The end mixture is then pumped out of the ground, where it is sent to the Hobson plant in Texas to be processed and dried.

Despite the support that shale gas activities receive in Texas, the residents are against this form of fracking. Whereas shale gas fracking takes place around 2 miles below the ground and well away from drinking water aquifers, fracking for uranium takes place between 400 and 800 feet below the ground, precisely where those aquifers exist.

Health worries exist due to the radioactive nature of uranium. Uranium emits alpha radiation, which whilst it has very low penetration, meaning that it cannot pass through the human skin to cause us external damage, it is also highly ionising, so drinking water that is contaminated with uranium can lead to kidney and liver failure, and cancer.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Doug W on January 29 2013 said:
    Ahh... there is almost no connection at all between the way in situ uranium mining works and "fracking." They are TOTALLY different.
  • Observer on January 25 2013 said:
    I am sure these health concerns will not matter because after all, they are only unpriced externalities and don't enter the bottom line of the profit and loss statements of the corporations involved.
  • John D on January 25 2013 said:
    Wonderful! Another creative way to lay waste to our natural environment.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News