• 2 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 11 minutes China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 16 minutes When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 4 hours Oil prices going down
  • 9 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 9 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 3 days Bullish and bearish outlook for oil
  • 3 days Rolls Royce shedding 4,600 jobs
  • 1 day Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 23 mins What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 2 days When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 9 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 2 days Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
  • 3 days After Trump-KJU, Trump-Putin Summit
  • 2 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 8 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 2 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 3 days U.S. Cars Will No Longer Need 55mpg Fuel Efficiency By 2025.
  • 3 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
U.S. Solar Growth Undeterred By Solar Panel Tariffs

U.S. Solar Growth Undeterred By Solar Panel Tariffs

Despite the implementation of tariffs…

UK Government cuts 2020 Solar Targets from 22GW to 11.9GW

Many people in the UK solar industry have been worried that the sudden cuts made by the government to the solar Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) policy would make it nearly impossible to achieve their 2020 solar targets.

The cuts were announced following a report by the consultancy firm Parson Brinkerhoff back in February which claimed that capital expenditure costs for new solar installations would fall by 10-30 percent by the end of the year, a further 5-25 percent by 2014, and continue to fall by small amounts in 2015 and beyond.

However a more recent impact assessment compiled by the government now confirms what many members of the solar industry, that PB’s conclusions about the fall of capital costs were largely overestimated. As a result the government has now decided to cut its 2020 solar targets from 22GW to just 11.9GW.

The report said that “at 11.9GW the central 2020 deployment projection is considerably less than the central estimate in the draft February [impact assessment] at 22GW. This is largely because PB’s estimate for the cost of large-scale PV installations is significantly higher than in their February report, and PB projects much slower reductions in installation costs from 2014 onwards than previously estimated.”

Some industry leaders were angry that the proposed reduction of the 2020 targets was not mentioned in the press release announcing the new impact assessment; instead the focus was on the fact that new cuts to the FiT policy have been delayed in order to give solar companies more time to adjust and prepare for the changes.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News