• 4 minutes Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 7 minutes Hydrogen Capable Natural Gas Turbines
  • 10 minutes World looks on in horror as Trump flails over pandemic despite claims US leads way
  • 13 minutes Large gas belt discovered in China
  • 3 mins Would bashing China solve all the problems of the United States
  • 49 mins Model 3 cheaper to buy than BMW 3 series.
  • 2 hours Yale University Epidemiologist Publishes Paper on Major Benefits of Hydroxchloroquine for High-risk Outpatients. Quacksalvers like Fauci should put lives ahead of Politics
  • 10 mins Thugs in Trumpistan
  • 1 hour Pompeo's Hong Kong
  • 3 hours China To Boost Oil & Gas Exploration, As EU Prepares To Commit Suicide
  • 1 day COVID 19 May Be Less Deadly Than Flu Study Finds
  • 3 hours China’s Oil Thirst Draws an Armada of Tankers
  • 45 mins Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history
  • 14 hours Income report showing potential future spending and economic growth
  • 14 hours US-China tech competition accelerates: on Friday 05/15 new sanctions on Huawei, on Monday 05/18 Samsung chief visits China
  • 2 days China to Impose Dictatorship on Hong Kong
  • 15 hours The CDC confirms remarkably low coronavirus death rate. Where is the media?

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds EPA Coal Regs

On April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Environmental Protection Agency’s rules on power plant pollution that blows across state lines. The 6-2 ruling overturned a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision last year that struck down the rule, and gives the Obama administration a major victory as it fights to curb air pollution from coal-fired power plants.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion for the majority, and was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.

Known as the Cross State Air Pollution Rule, the EPA finalized the rule in 2011 to limit pollution levels in 28 eastern U.S. states. The rule forced utilities to install pollution control equipment that would cut back on sulfur and nitrogen emissions that “contribute significantly” to pollution in neighboring states. Under the Clean Air Act, EPA can issue regulations under the “Good Neighbor” provision.

Related Article: Is Natural Gas No Better than Coal?

Many of the nation’s coal-fired power plants are located in the Midwest and South and produce air pollution that drifts into neighboring states. For example, an estimated 93 percent of ozone pollution in New Haven, Connecticut comes from out-of-state polluters.

The Supreme Court decision gives the Obama administration firmer legal ground to stand on as it embarks upon a ambitious campaign to cut coal pollution. The EPA is currently writing rules that would limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, which are due out in June.

Legal experts say future challenges to environmental regulations will face a higher legal bar as a result of this latest Supreme Court decision. The New York Times quotes Jody Freeman, director of the environmental law program at Harvard, as saying, “It’s a big win for the EPA, and not just because it has to do with this rule. It’s the fact that it’s setting the stage and creating momentum for what’s to come.”

By Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News