• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 14 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
Chinese EV Makers Unfazed by Western Tariffs

Chinese EV Makers Unfazed by Western Tariffs

China's booming EV industry poses…

A Cleantech Boom Is Underway

A Cleantech Boom Is Underway

Cleantech investments have surged recently…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

U.S. Losing Wind Energy Race

Washington finally said it was moving ahead with plans for wind energy off the mid-Atlantic Coast. A review of the region, considered one of the better wind regimes in the United States, found the adverse environmental or socioeconomic problems tied to wind energy development along the eastern coast would be minimal. A national laboratory said offshore wind could meet most of the domestic demand for electricity. With a 367-megawatt wind farm opening off the northern England coast, however, the United States, with its drill-happy congressional delegation and excitable conservationists, is quickly losing the clean energy race.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory found offshore wind energy could meet most of the U.S. energy demand. The U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management said it was finally ready to vet proposals for wind energy leases for the Outer Continental Shelf off the mid-Atlantic, presumably as part of President Obama's "all-of-the-above" energy policy. While the NREL said its figures didn't include cost or transmission availability, the offshore wind estimate is 3,125 GW more than the entire U.S. electric generating capacity in 2009.

While those numbers are impressive, they pale in comparison to the wind energy sector in much of Europe. France has the second-best wind energy regime in all of Europe and already enough offshore wind installed to meet some of its energy demand. This year, London cackled with glee about the untapped oil reserves left in the North Sea yet the United Kingdom, a country that's about the size of Oregon, is already the world leader in installed offshore wind capacity. How much does offshore wind energy is installed in the United States? None.

The U.S. Energy Department said offshore wind was an attractive power source but noted offshore wind turbines are expensive and require a lot of maintenance. Conservative groups like Americans for Prosperity complain wind farms off the New Jersey coast would cost jobs, increase consumer electric bills and wind up costing New Jersey taxpayers about $100 million.  The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, meanwhile, complains wind farms planned four miles off the Massachusetts coast would spoil the view. You know what was seen in the background during last year's British Open at the Royal St. Georges Golf Club in Ireland? Three nuclear cooling towers. And nobody complained.

Authorities at the U.S. Interior Department said they were examining "sweet spots" off the mid-Atlantic Coast for offshore wind development. Obama during the 2011 State of the Union address set of target of generating 80 percent of the country's electricity through clean energy resources like wind by 2035. This year, he called for an "all-of-the-above" policy for domestic energy. Democracy is a great thing in that it allows everyone a voice but loud doesn't mean influential. The United States is losing the green energy race, which means a continued reliance carbon-based natural resources, in part because some folks are upset about the view.

By. Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Rich on February 10 2012 said:
    Read the book, The Party's Over.

    Yes we do need fossil fuels for things like plastics, etc. That is why we will move to renewable energy and electric vehicles and for our energy supplies. We need to conserve fossil fuels for perhaps times when the turbines are not turning or the sun isn't shining.

    Think about it. It took our planet millions of years to develop these fossil fuels and we will deplete them is the course of 200 years starting with the industrial revolution. Estimates are unclear but some say that we have used most of our easily accessible fossil fuels and that now we are using more extreme and expensive measures to gather supplies of fossil fuels.

    Also the generation of electricity creates more pollution than any other industry including transportation.

    As far as unsightliness, look at all the utility poles that line our streets. You don't hear anyone complaining about them and they very unsightly in my opinion.

    I was recently in Vermont and had a view of wind turbines on a mountain ridge and they looked really cool. It made me feel that we are heading in the right direction.
  • art wissing on February 09 2012 said:
    guess everyone missed the memo that 80% of oil is used in transportation, trucks,buses, ships,airplanes. how isw the wind going to help that? the other memo missed is that ALL wind farms, and solar for that matter have to have power plants installed for each one, to back up the clean energy so when its not windy ,or the other problem, known as DARK happens we dont have to turn off out lights. the other thing about fossil fuels is they are used in thousands of products besides energy can the same be said about wind? or solar? try making plastic or fertilizer or rubber or steel then transport said product to market........

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News