• 4 minutes Trump will meet with executives in the energy industry to discuss the impact of COVID-19
  • 8 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 11 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 13 minutes Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 29 mins While China was covering up Covid-19 it went on an international buying spree for ventilators and masks. From Jan 7th until the end of February China bought 2.2 Billion masks !
  • 10 mins Ten days ago Trump sent New York Hydroxychloroquine. Being administered to infected. Covid deaths dropped last few days. Fewer on ventilators. Hydroxychloroquine "Cause and Effect" ?
  • 4 hours US Shale Resilience: Oil Industry Experts Say Shale Will Rise Again
  • 5 hours China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 2 hours Real Death Toll In CCP Virus May Be 12X Official Toll
  • 2 hours Marine based energy generation
  • 7 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 2 hours What If ‘We’d Adopted A More Conventional Response To This Epidemic?’
  • 3 hours How to Create a Pandemic
  • 4 hours Apple to Bypass Internet and Beam Directly to Phones
  • 9 hours Which producers will shut in first?
  • 19 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"

Turbulence Ahead for EU’s Aviation Emission Regulations

Turbulence Ahead for EU’s Aviation Emission Regulations

In an attempt to encourage airlines to reduce their emissions the EU released regulations that would charge all planes flying into or out of Europe for the emissions that they released during the flight. This created an uproar in China, India, and the US, who claimed that such regulations contravened international aviation treaties.

Congress and the Senate passed bills that would allow US airlines to ignore the EU law, India refused to share its emissions data, and China postponed a multi-billion dollar order with Airbus (the European airspace company), in what appeared to be the first signs of  a trade war.

In response, the EU has recently reduced the severity of its aviation emission regulations to only charge for carbon emissions whilst the planes are in European airspace, not for the entire flight. They hope that such a concession will help relieve pressure from the US, India, and China, and ultimately garner more favour at the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), which discussed market-based measures to reduce aviation emissions at a meeting in Montreal on Wednesday.

Related article: Sky’s the Limit – Aviation Biofuels About to Take Off?

In over 15 years the ICAO has been unable to make any progress to reduce the industry’s carbon footprint, managing only to agree non-binding fuel efficiency targets. Environmentalists claim that aviation emissions already contribute two or three percent of total global emissions, and that the share is likely to grow by 400% by 2050 if no action is taken soon.

Aviation Emissions

The EU hopes that by downsizing its regulations it is making a gesture of goodwill that would then encourage further talks, and eventually lead to a global, binding agreement to reduce emissions within the sector. They are basically hoping that taking one step back will allow them to take two steps forward.

The EU plan will likely be confirmed by the European Parliament on Thursday, and hopes that the ICAO will agree to some form of commitment to implement a strategy by 2016.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage




Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News