• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 2 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 1 hour The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 22 mins Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 1 hour Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 17 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 1 hour WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 11 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 22 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 22 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 22 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 1 day California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 1 day WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 24 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
Saudi Crackdown On Canada Could Backfire

Saudi Crackdown On Canada Could Backfire

The Saudi/Canadian spat that started…

Why Saudi Arabia Cut July Oil Production

Why Saudi Arabia Cut July Oil Production

Saudi Arabia’s oil production in…

TransCanada Wants Alberta To Commit To Keystone XL Capacity

Pipeline

TransCanada is urging the government of Alberta to buy capacity for its proposed Keystone XL pipeline in a ‘take or pay’ agreement similar to the one the province had pledged for the now-defunct Energy East pipeline, Bloomberg reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the issue.

Alberta had committed to a 20-year take or pay transportation service agreement with TransCanada’s proposed Energy East pipeline.

However, in early October, TransCanada said that it would not be proceeding with Energy East designed to carry oil from Alberta and Saskatchewan to Canada’s East Coast, a month after the company had sought a 30-day suspension of the project applications to review changed regulatory circumstances.

Alberta had supported that pipeline plan, and Premier Rachel Notley said “We are deeply disappointed by the recent decision from TransCanada,” following the scrapping of the project.

Now, according to Bloomberg sources, TransCanada’s urge for Alberta to commit to capacity for Keystone XL is putting Premier Notley in a difficult situation, because not fully supporting a pipeline in Canada’s largest oil province would not be a good political move, but supporting TransCanada’s project has placed her under pressure from rival company Enbridge.

According to former Progressive Conservative lawmaker, Ken Hughes, Alberta had strategic reasons to back the dead Energy East project because of the access to the Atlantic coast refineries, while support for Keystone would be a totally different thing.

Related: OPEC vs. U.S. Shale: The Battle For Asian Market Share

“It had a wide range of benefits, and none of those benefits come about with Keystone,” Hughes told Bloomberg comparing Energy with Keystone.

TransCanada completed last week the “open season” to solicit binding commitments from shippers for Keystone XL—a proposed crude oil pipeline beginning in Hardisty, Alberta, and extending south to Steele City, Nebraska. During the open season, launched at the end of July 2017, TransCanada solicited additional binding commitments from interested parties for transportation of crude oil on the Keystone Pipeline and for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project from Hardisty, Alberta to markets in Cushing, Oklahoma, and the U.S. Gulf Coast.

Keystone XL hinges on TransCanada’s review of the open season bids, and a final decision by Nebraska whether to allow construction, expected no later than November 23.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News