• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 7 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 11 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 14 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 47 mins Trump needs to educate US companies and citizens on Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army. This is real ECONOMIC WARFARE. To understand Chinese warfare read General Sun Tzu's "Art of War" . . . written 500 B.C.
  • 57 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 3 hours Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 2 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
  • 9 mins Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 6 hours Asia Oil Refiners Mull Run Cuts With Margins At 16 yrs. Low For Season
  • 10 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 5 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 4 hours Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS
  • 21 mins Prosecutors Fine Bosch 90 Million Euros For Emissions Cheating Role
  • 4 hours Trump bogged down in Mideast quagmire. US spent $Trillions, lost Thousands of lives, and lost goodwill. FOR WHAT? US interests ? WHAT INTEREST ? . . . . China greatest threat next 50 years.
  • 4 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 4 hours ARAMCO BOARD: Former Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris: I want to help Saudi Arabia become a 21st century economy
Chinese Oil Buyers Shun U.S. Crude

Chinese Oil Buyers Shun U.S. Crude

Chinese oil traders and refiners…

What The Market Is Overlooking In The Occidental Deal

What The Market Is Overlooking In The Occidental Deal

Occidental Petroleum has caught a…

Temporary vs. Permanent Increases in Government Spending

Not long ago Paul Krugman wrote:

To a first approximation, in other words, the effect of current fiscal policy — whether stimulus or austerity — an [on?] the actions of future governments is zero.

He makes further points at the link, although there is not a citation to the literature. I thought we should look at the evidence a little more closely. Some of it contradicts Krugman as read literally, though it is not all bad news for his larger point.

Here is an abstract from Brian Goff:

In spite of Peacock and Wiseman’s 1961 NBER study demonstrating the “displacement effect”, simplistic theoretical and empirical distinctions between temporary and permanent spending are common. In this paper, impulse response functions from ARMA models as well as Cochrane’s non-parametric method support Peacock and Wiseman’s conclusion by showing 1) government spending in the aggregate displays strong persistence to temporary shocks, 2) simple decomposition methods intended to yield a “temporary” spending series have a weak statistical foundation, and 3) persistence in spending has increased during this century. Also, as a basic “fact” of government spending behavior, the displacement effect lends support to interest group and bureaucracy models of government spending growth.

There is persistence to spending, although this study does not create a category for stimulus spending per se, however that concept might be defined.

Click here to read the full article



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News