• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 53 mins The power of propaganda has no boundaries: Which country has larger territory US od China
  • 15 mins Freedom of Speech for Dummies
  • 4 hours Iranian Oil Tanker struck by missiles off Jeddah
  • 34 mins South Korea Unveils Fighter Jet Mock-Up Amid Program Challenges
  • 16 hours Support Held. Back in UGAZ
  • 14 hours Crazy Stories From Round The World
  • 3 hours Any difference btw Hunter Biden on BOD of Ukraine Company vs. Qatar bailout of Kushner Real Estate 666 Fifth Ave ?
  • 2 hours Boring! See Ya Clowns, And Have Fun In Germany
  • 3 hours National Geographic Warns Billions Face Shortages Of Food And Clean Water Over Next 30 Years
  • 21 hours China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 20 hours Total SA In Expansion: $600 million For India's Adani Gas
  • 2 hours How The US Quietly Lost The 1st Amendment

Breaking News:

Is This The End Of China’s Gas Boom?

Julianne Geiger

Julianne Geiger

Julianne Geiger is a veteran editor, writer and researcher for Oilprice.com, and a member of the Creative Professionals Networking Group.

More Info

Surrey Quakes Caused by Oil Drilling? Not True, Study Shows

Surrey

It turns out that you really can’t blame the oil industry for everything. The UK oil industry has been saying for quite some time that earthquakes—even ones in the same general vicinity as oil drill sites—aren’t always the result of their drilling activity. Despite this self-serving statements to that effect, it turns out that may be true, according to a new study by the Imperial College of London, University of Bristol, and the British Geological Survey as cited by the BBC.

A study of 34 earthquakes known as the “Surrey swam”, which occurred between April 2018 and May 2019, determined that the quakes were natural events, and that “their closeness to oil extraction sites is probably a coincidence,” according to lead author Dr. Stephen Hicks.

The study reviewed the nature of the earthquakes. There are two types, the study explained: quakes that move the rocks on either side of the fault horizontally, and ones that move the rocks vertically. The latter is caused by oil extraction, where the former is a natural occurrence. 

The Surrey swam quakes were caused by horizontal movement, and therefore unlikely to be caused by oil extraction.

Other considerations that the study took into effect were how deep the quakes were and the location of the quakes. Both criteria pointed to natural quakes.

The quakes had previously been blamed on oil extraction.

Last April, after the Easter quake in Surrey, UKOG insisted there was no correlation between its drilling activity at Horse Hill and the quake. At the time, members of the Green Party had called for a suspension of all oil exploration in that area, pending an investigation.

The BGS at the time disclosed that there was, in fact, a link between oil exploration and earthquakes in general in some cases, but stopped short of blaming the oil industry for the April quake. The Horse Hill 1 site, the BGS pointed out at the time, had been drilled and tested in 2016 or before.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play