• 4 minutes Why Trump will win the wall fight
  • 9 minutes Climate Change: A Summer of Storms and Smog Is Coming
  • 12 minutes Maduro Asks OPEC For Help Against U.S. Sanctions
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 15 hours Ayn Rand Was Right
  • 1 day is climate change a hoax? $2 Trillion/year worth of programs intended to be handed out by politicians and bureaucrats?
  • 8 hours Oil imports by countries
  • 13 hours Tension On The Edge: Pakistan Urges U.N. To Intervene Over Kashmir Tension With India
  • 14 hours Solar and Wind Will Not "Save" the Climate
  • 13 hours Indian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. OilIndian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. Oil
  • 6 hours North Korea's Kim To Travel To Vietnam By Train, Summit At Government Guesthouse
  • 17 hours Sanctions or Support: Despite Sanctions, Iran's Oil Exports Rise In Early 2019
  • 5 hours America’s Shale Boom Keeps Rolling Even as Wildcatters Save Cash
  • 8 hours AI Will Eliminate Call Center Jobs
  • 12 hours NZ Oil, Gas Ban Could Cost $30 Bln
  • 2 hours US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
Emerging ‘Quality’ Problem To Haunt Oil Markets

Emerging ‘Quality’ Problem To Haunt Oil Markets

The divergence between lighter and…

Is Ocasio-Cortez Right To Dismiss Nuclear Energy?

Is Ocasio-Cortez Right To Dismiss Nuclear Energy?

The Democratic party unveiled its…

Shell Advises Shareholders To Reject Binding Climate Resolution

Shell truck

Royal Dutch Shell has recommended that its shareholders vote against a climate resolution that an activist climate group wants passed at the annual general meeting next month.

Dutch climate group Follow This has filed for a third consecutive year a proposal for a binding resolution to be voted at Shell’s AGM.

“Shareholders support Shell to take leadership in the energy transition to a net-zero-emission energy system. Therefore, shareholders request Shell to set and publish targets that are aligned with the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2°C,” the draft resolution says.

In a phone call with reporters on Monday, Shell’s chief executive Ben van Beurden said that “We share the objective of Follow This for Shell to show leadership in the energy transition but at the same time we consider the resolution unnecessary given that we have already outlined an approach that is much wider-ranging and much more progressive.”

Van Beurden has recently said that Shell will aim to bring down the net carbon footprint of its energy products by around half by 2050.

“I don’t think a 50 percent reduction of CO2 emissions footprint in 2050 meets the Paris climate agreement,” Follow This founder Mark van Baal told Reuters. “Shell uses these ambitions to do business as usual in the next decades,” van Baal noted.

Related: The Biggest Hurdle To China’s Yuan-Priced Crude Benchmark

Shell’s van Beurden said on Monday that the company’s current plan for energy transition is more progressive and flexible than the target-binding draft resolution of Follow This, because binding Shell to specific numbers could make it more difficult to shift strategies if government policies or other changes in the future affect the profitability of technologies.

Last week, Shell outlined its strategy for the coming ‘energy transition’ decades, saying that it will still sell the oil and gas the society needs, while adapting its portfolio to lower-carbon energy, “when this makes commercial sense.”

At the call with reporters, van Beurden also had a message to the mainstream investors who are worried that Shell’s investment case would become less and less compelling as the world shifts away from oil. Shell will not shrink in the future, and it is more than a pure exploration and production company, van Beurden said.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Chris on April 18 2018 said:
    Common sens prevailed at Shell. That's it, that's all. Thank you.
  • Surprised on April 17 2018 said:
    Surprised, I hope not.

    I don't see much interest in the oil industry for cleaner, lower carbon, lower emission fuels.

    Lately, there have been a lot of articles about oil companies lining up to apply for waivers from the EPA, so their small refineries won't have to comply with the RFS to blend in ethanol. EPA has been handing them out like Trick or Treat Candy, per one Houston Chronicle Article.

    What's reality?

    Ethanol has about one half the carbon footprint of gasoline. So if you were Really Interested in lower Carbon Emissions, you might embrace ethanol blending, rather than run away from it. Ethanol is also much cleaner burning than gasoline. (But don't tell the EPA, they don't want to know.)

    But don't worry, API is gearing up to fight year round availability of E15, any way they can, because, they don't have any interest in lower carbon fuels either.

    Surprised?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News