• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 days Does Toyota Know Something That We Don’t?
  • 1 day America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 7 days World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 9 days China is using Chinese Names of Cities on their Border with Russia.
  • 10 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 10 days OPINION: Putin’s Genocidal Myth A scholarly treatise on the thousands of years of Ukrainian history. RCW
  • 10 days CHINA Economy IMPLODING - Fastest Price Fall in 14 Years & Stock Market Crashes to 5 Year Low
  • 9 days CHINA Economy Disaster - Employee Shortages, Retirement Age, Birth Rate & Ageing Population
  • 21 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 10 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
  • 10 days "(Another) Putin Critic 'Falls' Out Of Window, Dies"
  • 11 days United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 11 days Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs

Scottish Oil Experts Scold Shell for Platform Abandonment Plans

Two renowned oil industry experts from Scotland have vigorously criticized Shell’s plans to leave major parts of four platforms in the Brent field standing when it decommissions the aged field that gave the name to the most widely used international price benchmark.

Professors Alex Russell and Peter Strachan, respectively chairman of the Scottish Oil Association and researcher at the Robert Gordon University, noted in a paper that the concrete structures will take hundreds of years to disintegrate and represent a potential hazard that local people will have to pay for, rather than the field operator.

The structures in question include platform legs – gravity-base structures – and the storage cells located within them. The storage cells serve to collect water and other fluids produced in the process of oil and gas extraction. The authors of the report, however, acknowledge that Shell has made the effort to clean the cells as best as possible.

The international oil major will start the decommissioning of the Alpha, Bravo, Charlie and Delta platforms after it gets the official go-ahead from the UK government. Specific plans for the decommissioning procedure should be filed with the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy department by the end of the year—another point of contention for the two experts.

According to Russell and Strachan, the decision about the decommissioning of the Brent field should depend on the approval of the Scottish government, not just the central government in London. Also, the decommissioning of the platforms should take place in Scotland, as close to Brent as possible, rather than anywhere else, as “the future decommissioning of topsides being undertaken outside Scotland smacks of rubbing salt into the wound.”

The paper’s authors also caution against the effect that a decision in favor of leaving the GBSs in place would have on the overall policy of the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, or OSPAR.

OSPAR is the authority that will make the ultimate decision about the Brent decommissioning, and as Shell has pointed out, it has already granted other offshore platform operators approval for leaving GBSs in place after the decommissioning of the platform to which they belong. Russell and Strachan argue that this kind of approval turns its own policy on its head, with the exception becoming the norm.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

ADVERTISEMENT

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Jew from Russia on August 31 2016 said:
    Much ado about nothing, Irina.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News