• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 1 hour One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 8 hours Russian Effect: U.S. May Soon Pause Preparations For Delivering F-35s To Turkey
  • 5 hours Chile Tests Floating Solar Farm
  • 18 mins China's Expansion: Italy Leads Europe Into China’s Embrace
  • 16 hours Poll: Will Renewables Save the World?
  • 16 hours New Rebate For EVs in Canada
  • 7 hours Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 9 hours Trump sells out his base to please Wallstreet and Oil industry
  • 7 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 1 day Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 1 day Oil-sands recovery by solvents has started on a trial basis; first loads now shipped.
  • 9 hours Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 14 hours 3 Pipes: EPIC 900K, CACTUS II 670K, GREY OAKS 800K
  • 18 hours The Political Debacle: Brexit delayed
Trade Tensions Are Keeping A Lid On Oil Prices

Trade Tensions Are Keeping A Lid On Oil Prices

Many crude market analysts are…

IEA Warns Of Looming Oil Market Deficit

IEA Warns Of Looming Oil Market Deficit

The IEA has said that…

Scientists Say U.S. Nuclear Plant Closures Will Raise Emissions

Ohio Nuclear Plant

As many nuclear power plants in the United States risk closure before their operating licenses expire, earlier shutdowns will not threaten the reliability of U.S. electricity, but could result in more emissions because zero-emission nuclear power will likely be replaced by fossil fuels such as natural gas and coal, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) said in an analysis on Thursday.

Nuclear power is the single biggest low-carbon source of electricity in the U.S., with 99 nuclear reactors at 60 plants accounting for 20 percent of the U.S. electricity generation in 2017.

However, cheap and abundant natural gas in the United States, increased renewable energy use, limited demand, and rising costs at nuclear power facilities have made many of the nuclear plants unprofitable, the UCS said.

“More than one-third of US nuclear plants are unprofitable or scheduled to close. If they’re replaced by natural gas, emissions will rise—with serious consequences for the climate,” the union said.

The analysis found that without new policies and with early retirement of nuclear power plants, natural gas- and coal-fired capacity will fill in the gap, and this could lead to the emissions in the U.S. power sector rising by between 4 percent and 6 percent.

Related: The Truth About Iran Oil Sanction Waivers

Policies encouraging carbon reduction would diversify the U.S. electricity mix and prevent early closures of nuclear plants, the UCS says, noting that nuclear generation would stay near reference-case levels, while renewable energy generation—predominantly wind and solar—would more than triple by 2035.

The UCS calls for carbon pricing, a low-carbon electricity standard, and financial support to nuclear plants, combined with strong clean energy policies and efforts to limit rate increases to consumers.

“The United States is facing a dilemma,” Steve Clemmer, co-author and director of energy research and analysis at UCS, said. “Nuclear power plants are being squeezed economically at a time when we need every source of low-carbon power we can get to replace retiring coal plants and prevent an overreliance on natural gas. Strong policies can prevent the abrupt closure of nuclear plants that meet stringent safety standards, while we continue to ramp-up investments in renewables, efficiency and other low carbon technologies to drive down emissions.”  

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Randy Verret on November 08 2018 said:
    So, that "100% renewables by 2050" slogan being spewed out by all the anti-fossil fuel activists might just be a mirage? What a SHOCKER! Spoiler alert: NO EASY BUTTON on this transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy, including nuclear...
  • Dan on November 08 2018 said:
    Recently published article by one university finding Princeton study of rising sea temperatures was mathematically incorrectly calculated. The real correct version is the sea temps are level to lower using correct math. Princeton failed to respond.
    Use natural gas, much safer and helps the move to NG autos.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News