• 4 minutes WTI Heading for $60
  • 6 minutes OPEC Builds Case For Oil Supply Cut
  • 15 minutes Major News---Bigger Picture
  • 5 mins Starbucks slashing its corporate workforce
  • 15 mins what's up with NG?
  • 1 day Can U.S. Add "Another Russia" to Oil Supply?
  • 2 hours Here We Go Again: EU Will Hit Back If U.S. Imposes Car Tariffs
  • 3 hours Plastic Myth-Busters
  • 14 hours Solid-State Batteries At Least a Decade Away From Mass Adoption
  • 2 hours Could EVs Become Cheaper than ICE Cars by 2023?
  • 20 hours A Strong U.S. Economy Will Boost Global Growth in 2019
  • 17 hours Pros and Cons of Coal
  • 3 hours Zohr Giant Gas Field Increases Production Six-Fold
  • 1 day GM Says No To Electric Pickup Trucks For 'Decades'
  • 1 day Germany: 'Europe United' Must Be Answer To Trump's 'America First'
  • 2 days Big Brother Is Watching You: Chinese ‘Gait Recognition’ Tech IDs People By How They Walk
  • 20 hours A lesson from VW
Oil Prices Fall To One-Year Lows

Oil Prices Fall To One-Year Lows

Oil prices fell to a…

Aramco CEO: Expect IPO In 2021

Aramco CEO: Expect IPO In 2021

Aramco CEO Amin Nasser has…

Scientists Say U.S. Nuclear Plant Closures Will Raise Emissions

Ohio Nuclear Plant

As many nuclear power plants in the United States risk closure before their operating licenses expire, earlier shutdowns will not threaten the reliability of U.S. electricity, but could result in more emissions because zero-emission nuclear power will likely be replaced by fossil fuels such as natural gas and coal, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) said in an analysis on Thursday.

Nuclear power is the single biggest low-carbon source of electricity in the U.S., with 99 nuclear reactors at 60 plants accounting for 20 percent of the U.S. electricity generation in 2017.

However, cheap and abundant natural gas in the United States, increased renewable energy use, limited demand, and rising costs at nuclear power facilities have made many of the nuclear plants unprofitable, the UCS said.

“More than one-third of US nuclear plants are unprofitable or scheduled to close. If they’re replaced by natural gas, emissions will rise—with serious consequences for the climate,” the union said.

The analysis found that without new policies and with early retirement of nuclear power plants, natural gas- and coal-fired capacity will fill in the gap, and this could lead to the emissions in the U.S. power sector rising by between 4 percent and 6 percent.

Related: The Truth About Iran Oil Sanction Waivers

Policies encouraging carbon reduction would diversify the U.S. electricity mix and prevent early closures of nuclear plants, the UCS says, noting that nuclear generation would stay near reference-case levels, while renewable energy generation—predominantly wind and solar—would more than triple by 2035.

The UCS calls for carbon pricing, a low-carbon electricity standard, and financial support to nuclear plants, combined with strong clean energy policies and efforts to limit rate increases to consumers.

“The United States is facing a dilemma,” Steve Clemmer, co-author and director of energy research and analysis at UCS, said. “Nuclear power plants are being squeezed economically at a time when we need every source of low-carbon power we can get to replace retiring coal plants and prevent an overreliance on natural gas. Strong policies can prevent the abrupt closure of nuclear plants that meet stringent safety standards, while we continue to ramp-up investments in renewables, efficiency and other low carbon technologies to drive down emissions.”  

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Randy Verret on November 08 2018 said:
    So, that "100% renewables by 2050" slogan being spewed out by all the anti-fossil fuel activists might just be a mirage? What a SHOCKER! Spoiler alert: NO EASY BUTTON on this transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy, including nuclear...
  • Dan on November 08 2018 said:
    Recently published article by one university finding Princeton study of rising sea temperatures was mathematically incorrectly calculated. The real correct version is the sea temps are level to lower using correct math. Princeton failed to respond.
    Use natural gas, much safer and helps the move to NG autos.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News