• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 2 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 14 hours NYT: Mass Immigration Roundups in U.S. to Start Sunday
  • 10 hours White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 6 hours Carrot And Stick: North Korea Suggests It Might Lift Weapons Test moratorium
  • 11 hours Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 6 hours Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 3 hours South Korea imports No Oil From Iran in June - First-Half Imports Fall 37%
  • 47 mins Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 2 hours A Silence is heard
  • 1 day U.S.- Taiwan: China Says Will Freeze Out U.S. Companies That Sell Arms To Taiwan
  • 1 day U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
  • 6 hours Starlink Internet Courtesy of Tesla
  • 7 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
Oil & Gas Discoveries Rise In High-Risk Oil Frontiers

Oil & Gas Discoveries Rise In High-Risk Oil Frontiers

Global discoveries of conventional oil…

Coal’s Long Goodbye

Coal’s Long Goodbye

U.S. coal producers continue to…

Scientists Say U.S. Nuclear Plant Closures Will Raise Emissions

Ohio Nuclear Plant

As many nuclear power plants in the United States risk closure before their operating licenses expire, earlier shutdowns will not threaten the reliability of U.S. electricity, but could result in more emissions because zero-emission nuclear power will likely be replaced by fossil fuels such as natural gas and coal, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) said in an analysis on Thursday.

Nuclear power is the single biggest low-carbon source of electricity in the U.S., with 99 nuclear reactors at 60 plants accounting for 20 percent of the U.S. electricity generation in 2017.

However, cheap and abundant natural gas in the United States, increased renewable energy use, limited demand, and rising costs at nuclear power facilities have made many of the nuclear plants unprofitable, the UCS said.

“More than one-third of US nuclear plants are unprofitable or scheduled to close. If they’re replaced by natural gas, emissions will rise—with serious consequences for the climate,” the union said.

The analysis found that without new policies and with early retirement of nuclear power plants, natural gas- and coal-fired capacity will fill in the gap, and this could lead to the emissions in the U.S. power sector rising by between 4 percent and 6 percent.

Related: The Truth About Iran Oil Sanction Waivers

Policies encouraging carbon reduction would diversify the U.S. electricity mix and prevent early closures of nuclear plants, the UCS says, noting that nuclear generation would stay near reference-case levels, while renewable energy generation—predominantly wind and solar—would more than triple by 2035.

The UCS calls for carbon pricing, a low-carbon electricity standard, and financial support to nuclear plants, combined with strong clean energy policies and efforts to limit rate increases to consumers.

“The United States is facing a dilemma,” Steve Clemmer, co-author and director of energy research and analysis at UCS, said. “Nuclear power plants are being squeezed economically at a time when we need every source of low-carbon power we can get to replace retiring coal plants and prevent an overreliance on natural gas. Strong policies can prevent the abrupt closure of nuclear plants that meet stringent safety standards, while we continue to ramp-up investments in renewables, efficiency and other low carbon technologies to drive down emissions.”  

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Randy Verret on November 08 2018 said:
    So, that "100% renewables by 2050" slogan being spewed out by all the anti-fossil fuel activists might just be a mirage? What a SHOCKER! Spoiler alert: NO EASY BUTTON on this transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy, including nuclear...
  • Dan on November 08 2018 said:
    Recently published article by one university finding Princeton study of rising sea temperatures was mathematically incorrectly calculated. The real correct version is the sea temps are level to lower using correct math. Princeton failed to respond.
    Use natural gas, much safer and helps the move to NG autos.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play