• 7 days Retail On Pace For Most Bankruptcies And Store Closures Ever In One Year: BDO
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 9 days Majors Oil COs diversify into Renewables ? What synergies forget have with Solar Panels and Wind Tirbines ? None !
  • 1 hour Most ridiculous green proposal
  • 11 hours The Green Hydrogen Problem That No One Is Talking About
  • 3 hours Biden's laptop
  • 7 hours Rethinking election outcomes for oil.
  • 1 hour The City of Sturgis Update on the Motorcycle Rally held there, and the MSM's reporting hence
  • 1 day China Sets Its Sights On Global [EV, AI, CRISPR, Fusion, Navel Lint Collector] Dominance
  • 3 hours QUESTION: With worldwide 1.4 Billion passenger vehicles and 360 Million commercial vehicles using combustion engines how long before gasoline and distillates measurably decline. .
  • 4 hours DOJ confirms FBI investigating Hunter Biden since last year for money laundering.
  • 11 hours Video Evidence that the CCP controls Joe Biden
  • 12 hours Making diamonds from thin air
  • 6 hours P@A will cost Texas Taxpayers $117 Billion.
  • 2 days Republicans Have Become the Party of Hate

Russia’s South Stream may have Defeated its Nabucco Rival

The Nabucco Pipeline was supposed to give Europe an alternative source of natural gas and free eastern European members from the oppression of Russia; yet Russia’s South Stream Pipeline, which follows the same route, may result in the abandonment of Nabucco. Instead the Azerbaijan and its partner, BP, may decide to build the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) to supply natural gas to southern Europe.

The Nabucco Pipeline was originally planned to be 3,900km long, stretching from Azerbaijan, across Turkey, and then up through the Balkans, and then onto Austria. This was then reduced to a 1,300km pipeline after it was decided to link it to an existing pipe in Turkey.

The TAP will only be 800km long, as it only stretches from Azerbaijan, across Turkey and Greece, and then under the sea to southern Italy.

Related article: U.S. Shale Boom Not Enough to Remove the Threat of Peak Oil

Nabucco is expected to cost $8 billion, and TAP will be $500 million less, although the Nabucco will allow the natural gas access to more markets.

Eastern Europe will benefit greatly from Nabucco as it will offer an alternative to Russian gas that is often supplied at high costs; but Italy will benefit from TAP as it looks for alternative supplies to its politically unstable North African sources.

Nabucco will help poor eastern bloc economies such as Bulgaria and Romania with the infrastructure investments that will be made in the countries; yet TAP will provide those same investment benefits to Greece and Italy whose economies (especially Greece’s) have been dragging the EU into recession. Germany will be especially happy if Greece receives boosts to its economy enough to no longer need future bailouts. There is also the fact that Russia’s South Stream pipe will bring the same economic benefits as Nabucco, although without the relief from reliance on Russian gas.

The decision over which pipeline to build will be made in June; although both offer good, and similar cases.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News