• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 11 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 5 hours Waste-to-Energy Chugging Along
  • 4 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 12 hours Contradictory: Euro Zone Takes Step To Deeper Integration, Key Issues Unresolved
  • 7 hours Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 8 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 1 hour Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 4 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 22 hours Zohr Giant Gas Field Increases Production Six-Fold
  • 9 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 21 hours No, The U.S. Is Not A Net Exporter Of Crude Oil
  • 17 hours UK Power and loss of power stations
  • 1 day USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 23 hours Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 18 hours EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants

Russia’s South Stream may have Defeated its Nabucco Rival

The Nabucco Pipeline was supposed to give Europe an alternative source of natural gas and free eastern European members from the oppression of Russia; yet Russia’s South Stream Pipeline, which follows the same route, may result in the abandonment of Nabucco. Instead the Azerbaijan and its partner, BP, may decide to build the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) to supply natural gas to southern Europe.

The Nabucco Pipeline was originally planned to be 3,900km long, stretching from Azerbaijan, across Turkey, and then up through the Balkans, and then onto Austria. This was then reduced to a 1,300km pipeline after it was decided to link it to an existing pipe in Turkey.

The TAP will only be 800km long, as it only stretches from Azerbaijan, across Turkey and Greece, and then under the sea to southern Italy.

Related article: U.S. Shale Boom Not Enough to Remove the Threat of Peak Oil

Nabucco is expected to cost $8 billion, and TAP will be $500 million less, although the Nabucco will allow the natural gas access to more markets.

Eastern Europe will benefit greatly from Nabucco as it will offer an alternative to Russian gas that is often supplied at high costs; but Italy will benefit from TAP as it looks for alternative supplies to its politically unstable North African sources.

Nabucco will help poor eastern bloc economies such as Bulgaria and Romania with the infrastructure investments that will be made in the countries; yet TAP will provide those same investment benefits to Greece and Italy whose economies (especially Greece’s) have been dragging the EU into recession. Germany will be especially happy if Greece receives boosts to its economy enough to no longer need future bailouts. There is also the fact that Russia’s South Stream pipe will bring the same economic benefits as Nabucco, although without the relief from reliance on Russian gas.

The decision over which pipeline to build will be made in June; although both offer good, and similar cases.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News