• 4 minutes Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 7 minutes Hydrogen Capable Natural Gas Turbines
  • 10 minutes World looks on in horror as Trump flails over pandemic despite claims US leads way
  • 13 minutes Large gas belt discovered in China
  • 7 hours Would bashing China solve all the problems of the United States
  • 12 hours COVID 19 May Be Less Deadly Than Flu Study Finds
  • 5 hours Yale University Epidemiologist Publishes Paper on Major Benefits of Hydroxchloroquine for High-risk Outpatients. Quacksalvers like Fauci should put lives ahead of Politics
  • 1 hour China to Impose Dictatorship on Hong Kong
  • 5 hours Incompetent "Journalists"
  • 12 hours Model 3 cheaper to buy than BMW 3 series.
  • 2 hours Thugs in Trumpistan
  • 14 hours Iran's first oil tanker has arrived near Venezuela
  • 15 hours Let’s Try This....
  • 18 hours Chicago Threatens To Condemn - Possibly Demolish - Churches Defying Lockdown
  • 20 hours HVDC Cheaper Than Low-carbon Natural Gas
  • 15 hours Pompeo's Hong Kong
  • 6 hours 60 mph electric mopeds
  • 20 hours Oil and Gas After COVID-19
James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Refiners Form Group to Oppose Oil Exports

Four refining companies have come together to oppose the growing push to scrap the crude oil export ban in the U.S. Fuel Fix reported on the newly found Consumers Refiners United for Domestic Energy (CRUDE), which so far consists of Alon USA Energy Inc, PBF Energy, Monroe Energy, and Philadelphia Energy Services. They came together in late January in response to the emergence of a campaign to remove the nearly 40-year old ban on oil exports. CRUDE will focus its outreach efforts on Capitol Hill and regulators at the Commerce Department.

The surge in oil production in the United States has provided refiners with a windfall. Domestic crude can at times trade for a discount relative to the global price of oil, lowering the input costs for refined products. Refiners can process that crude into higher-value petroleum products for export. They are concerned that allowing crude to be exported without restrictions will raise the price per barrel. “Why would they support lifting the ban if they didn’t think it was going to lift prices?” said Jeff Peck, a lobbyist hired by CRUDE. “That’s obviously good for them, but it’s not going to be good for the American consumer, who is going to pay more at the pump.”

Related Article: US Energy Boom vs Russian Energy Influence

Drillers, on the other hand, want to be able to sell their oil to more lucrative markets abroad. And by opening up the U.S., they argue, higher demand will support more drilling and thereby further lifting U.S. oil production.

The division marks a rare split in the oil and gas industry, whose players usually speak in concert. It remains to be seen what kind of effect the new CRUDE group can have. At this point export supporters have gained significant momentum in the first few months of 2014. They have found a powerful voice in Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) who has made oil exports a signature issue.

By James Burgess Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Mike Mahoney on March 19 2014 said:
    Which explains the instant bellowing to lift the export ban to hurt Russia. It is almost too convenient.
    Coming from the same sources who have said, for years, that pushing energy to one locale or another is ineffective at making price changes for the product since it's a globally traded market. So then, how does it suddenly happen that pushing energy from the U.S. to Europe would impact Russia? Betcha a dozen rubels that China would buy anything Russia offers.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News