• 2 days Retail On Pace For Most Bankruptcies And Store Closures Ever In One Year: BDO
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 4 days Majors Oil COs diversify into Renewables ? What synergies forget have with Solar Panels and Wind Tirbines ? None !
  • 2 hours Clean Energy Is Canceling Gas Plants
  • 16 hours GAME CHANGER: MIT Startup Commonwealth Fusion says Commercial Product by early 2030s ! THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING..
  • 4 hours Rethinking election outcomes for oil.
  • 6 hours The Leslie Stahl/60 Minutes Interview with President Trump
  • 2 days America's Frontline Doctors - Safely Start Living Again!
  • 15 hours OP article : "Trump blasts Biden Fracking Plan . . . "
  • 2 hours Australia’s Commodities Heartland Set for Major Hydrogen Plant
  • 6 hours Video Evidence that the CCP controls Joe Biden
  • 18 hours Biden denies fracking ban
  • 2 days Is the coal industry on the way out?
  • 2 days "COVID Kills Another Oil Rally" by Tom Kool 10/16/2020
  • 3 days Conoco Pledges ‘Net-Zero’ Emissions in Break With U.S. Rivals
The 3 Hottest Renewable Energy IPOs

The 3 Hottest Renewable Energy IPOs

Investors have been betting the…

Trump Blasts Biden's Fracking Plans At Rally

Trump Blasts Biden's Fracking Plans At Rally

President Donald Trump told supporters…

Railway Company Lawsuit Highlights Dangers Of Oil By Rail

Norfolk Southern Railway is suing a company that manufactures railroad ties because it didn’t use the right protective coating for the ties, and now Norfolk Southern will need to replace more than 4.7 million of these to avoid accidents, including oil by rail accidents.

The Alabama tie manufacturer, Boatright Railroad Products, allegedly used motor oil, anti-freeze, paint and several other substances to coat the ties, instead of creosote, which is normally used for protective coating of railroad ties. The problem is that these compounds do not protect the wood, allowing it to decay faster than it would otherwise, increasing the risk of accidents.

The lawsuit should bring attention to the risk inherent in the transportation of crude oil by rail, as Norfolk Southern knows from its own painful experience: last year, the company was fined by the Virginian environmental watchdog for an oil spill that resulted from a collision of two trains. The collision derailed both locomotives and at least five cars, one of which was a tank carrying 23,500 gallons of oil. More than 17,000 gallons were spilled.

Transporting oil by rail is becoming increasingly popular as opposition against new pipeline projects intensifies and oil producers seek alternatives. However, it is not becoming safer, as a recent report from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics has found.

According to the BTS, only 9 percent of tank cars that transport flammable liquids are compliant with the stricter safety requirements approved two years ago. The majority of the tank car fleet used to carry oil and fuels was still of the more accident-prone, thinner-shelled DOT-111 type. What’s more, the report found, the rail car fleet for flammable liquids will only meet these stricter requirements in 2029.

Railway transportation of crude oil is riskier than pipeline transportation and more expensive for producers, but they have had to resort to it because of the shortage of pipeline capacity. In fact, railway shipments of oil could increase in the future.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Bill Simpson on November 03 2017 said:
    Concrete is the way to go.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News