• 4 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 12 minutes Western Canada Select price continues to sink
  • 18 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 1 hour WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 3 hours China still to keep Iran oil flowing amid U.S. sanctions
  • 24 mins How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 2 hours Is NAFTA dead? Or near breakthrough?
  • 5 hours China goes against US natural gas
  • 7 hours Japan carmakers admits using falsified emissions data
  • 5 hours Saudi PIF In Talks To Invest In Tesla Rival Lucid
  • 4 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 4 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 21 hours Hey Oil Bulls - How Long Till Increasing Oil Prices and Strengthening Dollar Start Killing Demand in Developing Countries?
  • 3 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 2 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
Saudi Arabia And Iran Reignite The Oil Price War

Saudi Arabia And Iran Reignite The Oil Price War

As U.S. sanctions on Tehran…

Is Mexico Set To Boost Oil Output?

Is Mexico Set To Boost Oil Output?

Mexico’s president-elect is determined to…

Rail Safety Regs Could Hit Canadian Oil Sands

New regulations designed to increase the safety of transporting crude oil by rail could mean heightened scrutiny on oil coming from Canada’s oil sands. The February 25 rule issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation called for all crude shipped by rail to be tested and properly classified. This would have the effect of ensuring that highly flammable crude oil is carried in safer rail cars, which would theoretically reduce the chances of a major spill or explosion.

The rule may adversely impact Canadian oil sands, as they could be reclassified from the “Group III” designation to a much stricter “Group I” or “Group II,” reserved for more dangerous and toxic substances. This would require tank-cars to have stronger standards, potentially raising costs for oil that has up to now been shipped by lighter rail cars. However, some oil sands companies maintain that if the bitumen is not diluted with lighter forms of oil, they can avoid regulation because it would count as a separate product and wouldn’t trigger the rule.

Related Article: Oil Train Derailments Reaching Crisis Point

Canada is currently shipping more than 200,000 barrels of oil sands by rail. That number is set to more than double to 500,000 by the end of 2014. Federal investigators recently concluded that the train that derailed outside of Pittsburgh on February 13 and spilled 3,500 to 12,000 gallons of oil was in fact carrying heavy crude from Canada. The series of train crashes has provided fodder for both oil sands supporters and detractors. Supporters argue that building more pipeline capacity would reduce the occurrence of these incidents, while environmentalists point to these events as evidence that oil sands are inherently more dangerous.  

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News