• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 17 mins U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 1 hour Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 3 days US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 2 days EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 17 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 4 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 15 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 1 hour Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 3 days A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 2 days 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 4 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 3 days Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
The Mini-Bear Market For Crude

The Mini-Bear Market For Crude

The hedge fund withdrawal from…

Carbon Pricing Won't Kill Big Oil

Carbon Pricing Won't Kill Big Oil

Big oil has agreed to…

Paris Agreement Could Cost Big Oil Big Bucks: Report

Oil

If governments around the world stick to the Paris Agreement targets for CO2 emissions, big oil companies stand to lose US$2.3 trillion in the period until 2025. This is the striking outtake from a new report by Carbon Tracker, a climate change think tank, which partnered with a group of institutional investors to compile it.

The authors of the report analyzed the 69 biggest public oil and gas companies, and compared how they will fare in terms of capital expenditure on a business-as-usual basis and on a basis that involved full compliance with the core target of the Paris Agreement: reducing the rise of global temperatures by 2 degrees Celsius (the D2 scenario). According to the report, there was some very bad news for these companies.

In a D2 scenario, potentially unviable new oil and gas projects range from below 10 percent to as much as 70 percent for some companies in the lineup. The US$2.3-tillion figure represents about a third of the 69 companies’ combined capex until 2025. In other words, under a D2 scenario, these companies could waste a third of their combined capital budgets on oil and gas output that will simply not be needed.

The worst affected companies under this D2 scenario would be Apache and Southwestern Energy, both with a 60-70 percent exposure to unviable projects. Things don’t look much better for Exxon – its exposure is between 40 and 50 percent. Shell and Chevron are both in the 30-40 percent band of exposure, as are Total, Noble Energy, and Rosneft. Anadarko, Occidental Petroleum, BP, and Lukoil are with an even lower exposure, at 20-30 percent.

Related: Shale Efficiency Has Peaked… For Now

It’s worth noting that full compliance with Paris Agreement targets are only a possible future. In fact, in its recent Energy Technology Perspectives, the International Energy Agency warned that at the moment, just a tenth of renewable energy technology globally is up to the task of meeting the agreement’s targets. So, the D2 scenario is by no means a given.

On the other hand, Big Oil might see investor outflows. Reuters notes in its report on the Carbon Tracker document that Sweden’s largest pension fund, AP7, has cut its exposure to six energy companies, among them Exxon, on concern that they are in violation of the Paris Agreement.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Josh on June 21 2017 said:
    That's the big risk: between activist shareholders (Blackrock anyone?), carbon conscious investors and falling oil prices, we might see the oil industry look like coal pretty soon. From an investment perspective that won't be pretty.

    And remember- capital flight and bankruptcies will always come before production volumes fall significantly.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News