X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

  • 3 minutes Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Scientists Warn That Filling The Sahara With Solar Panels Is A Bad Idea
  • 11 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 15 minutes Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 4 hours IS SAUDI ARABIA SENDING A MESSAGE TO BIDEN
  • 1 day America Makes Plans to Produce Needed Rare Earth Minerals Domestically
  • 8 hours Texas forced to have rolling black outs, primarily because of large declines in output from fossil fuel power plants
  • 1 day U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 3 days Former BP Exec "Biden not in war against oil" . . Really ?
  • 3 days Here we go - again: plug-in hybrids cost motorists more than what they were told
  • 3 days Texas Supply Chain Massacre
  • 1 day Top Conservative Lawyer Says Trump Can Stand Trial
  • 1 day “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 3 days An exciting development in EV Aviation: Volocopter

OPEC Compliance With Output Cuts Was Only 74% In May

Not even a full month into OPEC’s deep production cut agreement, rumors have already surfaced that there is a difference of opinion over a possible extension of the oil production cuts—as usual, with Saudi Arabia on one side and Russia on the other.

But those discussions seem premature, given the latest Reuters survey that suggests that the cartel failed to fully comply with its agreed-upon quotas in May.

According to the survey data, Nigeria and Iraq did not live up to their commitments under the massive production cut deal that promised to take 9.7 million barrels of oil production per day out of the oversupplied market.

Overall, the survey showed the group cut just 5.91 million bpd from April levels, producing 24.77 million bpd. This is 4.48 million bpd of the promised reduction, or 74% compliant.

While some have suggested that the reason for OPEC’s failure to bring production down to promised levels is due to contractual obligations with buyers given the short timeframe between the date the agreement was made and its implementation, Iraq has a history of production quota noncompliance.

For May, Iraq reached just 38% compliance with its promised cuts.

Nigeria was even less faithful to the quotas, cutting just 19% of what it promised, according to the Reuters survey.

Despite the few members who failed to being production down as low as promised, OPEC’s overall May production was the lowest that it’s been since 2002, according to Reuters.

The sharp cuts in May, however, are watered down by the fact that several OPEC members, including Kuwait, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia, produced record-high volumes in April, which flooded the market while the world was beginning to see what was a massive drop off in demand.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on May 30 2020 said:
    One thing is clear. Saudi Arabia shouldn’t be saddled with the bulk of the OPEC+ production cuts. Still, OPEC+ in a typical fashion will slowly but surely reach full compliance with the cuts.

    For the time being, the decline of an estimated 4 million barrels a day (mbd) from US oil production (primarily shale oil) more than compensates for OPEC’s deficit.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Maxander on May 30 2020 said:
    That means 100% compliance from OPECs is yet to come in June, July & to fulfill entire 100% compliance, it may even cut production by 126% of proposed to cover compliance of lower 74%.
    I think they would go for it because crude oil prices falling below 0 is more than just a nightmare. It's a shock not to be forgotten any time in coming future for OPECs.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News