• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 9 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 4 hours Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 22 hours India After Elections: Economy And Hindu Are The First Modi’s Challenges
  • 27 mins Theresa May to Step Down
  • 19 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 8 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 8 hours Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 19 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 11 hours IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
  • 228 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 21 hours Compensation For A Trade War: Argentina’s Financial Crisis Creates An Opportunity For China
  • 22 hours Old - New Kim: Nuclear Negotiations With U. S. Will Never Resume Unless Washington Changes Its Position
  • 17 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry

Norway’s Arctic Dreams are Shattered by Rising Costs and Taxes

Constant increases in the costs of oil and gas projects along with a hike in taxes have combined with falling prices to force many oil companies to reconsider their future investments in Norway, delaying Arctic projects and damaging the country’s hopes of reviving its falling oil output volumes, which are at a 25 year low.

The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) told Reuters that the costs associated with Norway’s oil sector have nearly doubled since 2005, and last year’s tax hike has coincided with a global effort by oil companies to reduce spending in order to create healthier cash flows.

Statoil has already announced delays to some of its biggest projects, such as the $15.5 billion Johan Castberg development in the Barents Sea and the Johan Sverdup field, which is the company’s largest discovery in decades with an estimated 2.9 billion barrels of oil.

Related article: Norway’s Oil Fund Makes Every Norwegian a Kroner Millionaire

The NPD also added that Shell has delayed its Linnorm field in the Norwegian Sea, which was expected to begin pumping 100,000 barrels a day, and now Statoil are considering the future of the 50 million barrel Trestakk project. Other projects that have been delayed include the Maria development by Wintershall, and RWE’s Zidane project in the Norwegian Sea.

John Olaisen, an analyst at ABG Sundal Collier, explained that “pretty much all of the projects in the Barents Sea are in danger and I'm reasonably sure that all of the gas projects in the Barents Sea will be put on hold for many years.

The reason for this is a combination of gas prices, costs and lack of infrastructure in the Barents Sea. I don't think these projects are gone forever, they will just be put on hold for some years.”

Brent crude oil spot prices averaged from $108-$112 a barrel over the last six months of 2013, but the IEA has predicted that increased production from Libya, Iraq, and Iran will begin to impact market in the coming years with prices falling to $105 in 2014 and then $102 in 2015.

Ivar Aasheim, the head of Norwegian development at Statoil, has said that “most people who make oil price forecasts see lower oil prices going forward than they thought a year ago. This leads to a bit more careful approach.”

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News