• 5 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 7 minutes Can LNG Kill Oil?
  • 8 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 11 minutes US Shale: Technology
  • 5 hours “The era of cheap & abundant energy is long gone. Money supply & debt have grown faster than real economy. Debt saturation is now a real risk, requiring a global scale reset.”"We are now in new era of expensive unconventional energy
  • 9 hours CoV-19: China, WHO, myth vs fact
  • 5 hours Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 9 hours Blowout videos
  • 14 hours Democrats Plan "B" Bloomberg Implodes. Plan "C" = John Kerry ?
  • 1 hour Has Trump put the USA at the service of Israel?
  • 2 days Question - What if there are no buyers for Chevron's Appalachia Assets?
  • 6 mins Oil Stocks
  • 1 day Natural Gas
  • 2 days Cheap natural gas is making it very hard to go green
  • 2 days Energy from thin air?
  • 2 days OIL trades as if the virus is a 1 quarter event. As if it's Containable, Reversible and Temporary. Is it ?
Can’t Afford An EV? You’re Paying For It Anyway

Can’t Afford An EV? You’re Paying For It Anyway

Perhaps the best arguments of…

Oil Suppliers Slash Prices To Save Asian Market Share

Oil Suppliers Slash Prices To Save Asian Market Share

As Asian refineries are reducing…

Norway Wins Lawsuit Over Arctic Oil Drilling

Aker Norway

A Norwegian court ruled on Thursday that Norway’s government had not violated the constitution in awarding drilling licenses in the Arctic, and dismissed a lawsuit brought by environmental groups that wanted the Artic oil drilling licenses withdrawn.

In November 2017, environmentalist organizations took the Norwegian government to court over the awarding of oil drilling licenses in the Arctic, arguing on the first day of hearings that the 2015 licenses should be withdrawn as they violate Norway’s constitution and the country’s pledge to fulfill the terms of the Paris Climate Agreement.

On the last day of hearings on November 22, Truls Gulowsen, head of Greenpeace Norway said:

“The Norwegian Constitution gives the right to a healthy environment. Winning this case -- having new oil licenses in the Arctic ruled invalid -- would keep millions of oil barrels in the ground. During the hearing, I believe we have made it clear that opening up new oil fields will be in violation of both the Norwegian constitution and the Paris Agreement. We have also shown that Norway, in fact, risks losing billions by investing in these oil fields.”

According to analysts, the lawsuit was a longshot, but if the greens had won, it would have set a precedent and prompted more groups to sue governments for violating climate agreement targets.

“The environmental organisations’ argument that the plan violates the Constitution’s Article 112 has not succeeded,” an Oslo court ruled today. “The state, represented by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, is exonerated.”

Related: What’s Behind The Canadian Rig Count Crash

“Whether Norway is doing enough for the environment and climate, and if it was sensible to open fields so far north and east” are issues “better assessed through political processes,” the court added.

The court also ordered Greenpeace Norway and its co-plaintiff, Natur og Ungdom (Nature and Youth), to pay the state’s legal costs of US$71,730 (580,000 Norwegian crowns).

Greenpeace Norway said that it would now review the verdict carefully and consider whether to appeal it and if it has the finances to do that, Gulowsen said.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News