• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 2 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 20 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 11 hours Today in Energy
  • 2 hours Iran Captures British Tanker sailing through Straits of Hormuz
  • 2 hours Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 6 hours Drone For Drone = War: What is next in the U.S. - Iran the Gulf Episode
  • 1 day Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 1 day Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 2 days Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 1 day Why Natural Gas is Natural
  • 2 days Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 22 hours LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
  • 2 days Excellent Choice: Germany's Von der Leyen Secures Powerful EU Executive Top Job

New U.S. Emissions Rules Have Popular, But Not Political, Support

U.S. President Barack Obama’s new rules to reduce carbon emissions are getting very little support from the Republican Party leadership or even some of his fellow Democrats, but are widely supported by ordinary Americans.

Speaking at the unveiling of the plan  on June 2, Gina McCarthy, administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said the goal is to reduce carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants by 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.

McCarthy stressed the policy’s flexibility, saying it will allow states several options to achieve the goal, including adopting efficient energy technology and adding alternatives like wind and solar.

Another option would be cap-and-trade programs, under which companies with high greenhouse gas emissions could buy emission allowances from companies with fewer emissions in an effort to reduce their combined impact on the environment.

McCarthy said this flexibility makes the program “ambitious but achievable,” adding, “That’s how we can keep our energy affordable and reliable. The glue that holds this plan together — and the key to making it work — is that each state’s goal is tailored to its own circumstances, and states have the flexibility to reach their goal in whatever way works best for them.”

Related Article: As EPA Launches War On Emissions, U.S. Plays Catch Up With Europe On Renewables

Senior Republican officials immediately condemned the plan, and even some Democrats in Congress – notably those who represent, or are running for election in, states with coal and other energy industries – criticized it, including Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Alison Lundergan Grimes of Kentucky, who is challenging incumbent Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.

Despite the political opposition, a poll by The Washington Post and ABC News found 70 percent popular support for limits on carbon emissions. The survey, conducted shortly before the plan was announced, also found support from 63 percent of respondents for such an effort even if, hypothetically, it caused their own energy expenses to rise by $20 a month.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • M. Kiewlich on June 08 2014 said:
    I don't know any ordinary American of either party that thinks that causing energy prices to "necessarily skyrocket" is a good idea. We live in the real world unlike the politicians and the elite in this country who support this farce! Also we don't trust the polls done by MSM idiots like the Washington Post!
  • Mike Mcfalls on June 05 2014 said:
    Let's see how popular they will be when the skyrocketing electricity bills start coming in.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play