• 5 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 8 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 12 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 14 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 2 mins Which producers will shut in first?
  • 3 mins Washington doctor removed from his post, over covid
  • 4 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 5 hours Shale Legs
  • 3 hours How to Create a Pandemic
  • 6 mins The Most Annoying Person You Have Encountered During Lockdown
  • 7 hours Real Death Toll In CCP Virus May Be 12X Official Toll
  • 12 hours WE have a suicidal player in the energy industry
  • 3 hours KSA taking Missiles from ?
  • 12 hours Eight Billion Dollars Wasted on Nuclear Storage Plant
  • 4 hours Trump eyes massive expulsion of suspected Chinese spies
  • 6 hours Did Trump start the oil price war?
This Supermajor Is About To Slash Permian Oil Production

This Supermajor Is About To Slash Permian Oil Production

Chevron is slashing capital expenditures,…

New EPA Rules Could See the West's Largest Coal Power Plant Shut Down by 2017

New EPA Rules Could See the West's Largest Coal Power Plant Shut Down by 2017

The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a new plan to clean the air in the national parks of Arizona; a move that could force the largest coal-fired power plant in the West out of business.

Owners of the plant fear that the proposal could push them into an unprofitable situation which would force a shutdown of the plant as soon as 2017.

George Hardeen, a spokesman for the plant, has admitted that “the critical issue is the timing of it. If the EPA requires it to be done within a short period of time, it becomes economically non-viable.”

The plant burns eight million tonnes of coal a year, and provides power to Arizona, Nevada, and California, as well as most of the power used in the Central Arizona Project, which supplies water to Phoenix.

The new EPA rules will require the installation of new pollution controls which are estimated to cost $1.1 billion. The owners of the plant say that it would be financially non beneficial to invest such a large sum when their lease for the land of the plant expires in 2019, and as of yet no deal has been agreed for an extension. Without a guarantee of that lease extension the money will not be invested and the plant will be closed.

Hardeen explained that, “you'd be putting a big expense out and not know if you'll be getting that expense back over time.”

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • dralston on July 26 2012 said:
    Is there some reason not to mention the name of the power plant or the location? George Hardeen must be the spokesman for ??

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News