• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 3 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 59 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 16 hours Old - New Kim: Nuclear Negotiations With U. S. Will Never Resume Unless Washington Changes Its Position
  • 13 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 15 hours India After Elections: Economy And Hindu Are The First Modi’s Challenges
  • 2 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 9 hours Theresa May to Step Down
  • 2 hours Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 12 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 4 hours IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
  • 227 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 14 hours Compensation For A Trade War: Argentina’s Financial Crisis Creates An Opportunity For China
  • 10 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
The Silver Lining Of An Oil Price Crash

The Silver Lining Of An Oil Price Crash

It has been a dismal…

The Trade War Is Transforming Oil Markets

The Trade War Is Transforming Oil Markets

China-US trade talks have exposed…

New EPA Rules Could See the West's Largest Coal Power Plant Shut Down by 2017

The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a new plan to clean the air in the national parks of Arizona; a move that could force the largest coal-fired power plant in the West out of business.

Owners of the plant fear that the proposal could push them into an unprofitable situation which would force a shutdown of the plant as soon as 2017.

George Hardeen, a spokesman for the plant, has admitted that “the critical issue is the timing of it. If the EPA requires it to be done within a short period of time, it becomes economically non-viable.”

The plant burns eight million tonnes of coal a year, and provides power to Arizona, Nevada, and California, as well as most of the power used in the Central Arizona Project, which supplies water to Phoenix.

The new EPA rules will require the installation of new pollution controls which are estimated to cost $1.1 billion. The owners of the plant say that it would be financially non beneficial to invest such a large sum when their lease for the land of the plant expires in 2019, and as of yet no deal has been agreed for an extension. Without a guarantee of that lease extension the money will not be invested and the plant will be closed.

Hardeen explained that, “you'd be putting a big expense out and not know if you'll be getting that expense back over time.”

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • dralston on July 26 2012 said:
    Is there some reason not to mention the name of the power plant or the location? George Hardeen must be the spokesman for ??

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News