• 5 days Retail On Pace For Most Bankruptcies And Store Closures Ever In One Year: BDO
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 7 days Majors Oil COs diversify into Renewables ? What synergies forget have with Solar Panels and Wind Tirbines ? None !
  • 11 mins Most ridiculous green proposal
  • 16 mins China Sets Its Sights On Global [EV, AI, CRISPR, Fusion, Navel Lint Collector] Dominance
  • 3 hours The Green Hydrogen Problem That No One Is Talking About
  • 14 hours Video Evidence that the CCP controls Joe Biden
  • 21 hours Rethinking election outcomes for oil.
  • 4 hours The City of Sturgis Update on the Motorcycle Rally held there, and the MSM's reporting hence
  • 2 days The Leslie Stahl/60 Minutes Interview with President Trump
  • 2 hours P@A will cost Texas Taxpayers $117 Billion.
  • 1 day Republicans Have Become the Party of Hate
  • 1 day Australia’s Commodities Heartland Set for Major Hydrogen Plant
  • 2 days WallStreet Journal editorial " . . Big Tech-Media are the propaganda arm of Democrat Party leading to one party autocratic rule. " This is the State of the Union.
  • 3 days Even Obama can't muster a crowd to support Biden.
  • 2 days Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 2 days Clean Energy Is Canceling Gas Plants
  • 2 days Vote Biden for Higher Oil Prices
Will A Fracking Boom Ever Happen In Mexico?

Will A Fracking Boom Ever Happen In Mexico?

Mexico has a massive shale…

The Consolidation Of U.S. Shale

The Consolidation Of U.S. Shale

The shale consolidation wave is…

New EPA Rules Could See the West's Largest Coal Power Plant Shut Down by 2017

The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a new plan to clean the air in the national parks of Arizona; a move that could force the largest coal-fired power plant in the West out of business.

Owners of the plant fear that the proposal could push them into an unprofitable situation which would force a shutdown of the plant as soon as 2017.

George Hardeen, a spokesman for the plant, has admitted that “the critical issue is the timing of it. If the EPA requires it to be done within a short period of time, it becomes economically non-viable.”

The plant burns eight million tonnes of coal a year, and provides power to Arizona, Nevada, and California, as well as most of the power used in the Central Arizona Project, which supplies water to Phoenix.

The new EPA rules will require the installation of new pollution controls which are estimated to cost $1.1 billion. The owners of the plant say that it would be financially non beneficial to invest such a large sum when their lease for the land of the plant expires in 2019, and as of yet no deal has been agreed for an extension. Without a guarantee of that lease extension the money will not be invested and the plant will be closed.

Hardeen explained that, “you'd be putting a big expense out and not know if you'll be getting that expense back over time.”

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • dralston on July 26 2012 said:
    Is there some reason not to mention the name of the power plant or the location? George Hardeen must be the spokesman for ??

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News