• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 2 mins DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 49 mins POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 3 hours Tories on course to win majority
  • 21 hours Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 1 min americavchina.com
  • 3 hours Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 5 hours Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 8 hours WTO is effectively neutered. Trump *already* won the trade war against China and WTO is helpless to intervene
  • 1 day Forget The Hype, Aramco Shares May be Valued At Zero Next Year
  • 8 mins Oil tankers attacked in Gulf of Oman - - - photos
  • 4 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
Is Aramco Really Worth $2 Trillion?

Is Aramco Really Worth $2 Trillion?

Saudi Aramco managed to hit…

Why Exxon’s Stock Could Hit $100 In 2020

Why Exxon’s Stock Could Hit $100 In 2020

Oil and gas giant ExxonMobil…

Meat, Dairy Industry Surpass Big Oil As World’s Biggest Polluters

Cows

Within the next few decades, Big Meat and Big Dairy could surpass Big Oil as the world’s biggest climate polluters, a new study by non-profit GRAIN and the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) showed on Wednesday.

The world’s biggest animal protein producers could soon surpass ExxonMobil, Shell, and BP as the largest contributors to climate pollution, according to the study.

IATP and GRAIN jointly published the study that quantifies emissions from 35 of the world’s largest meat and dairy companies and reviews their plans to fight climate change.

The report found out that the five largest meat and dairy corporations combined—JBS, Tyson, Cargill, Dairy Farmers of America, and Fonterra—are already responsible for more annual greenhouse gas emissions than ExxonMobil, Shell, or BP. According to one figure in the report, the combined emissions of the top five companies are on par with those of Exxon and significantly higher than those of Shell or BP.

Moreover, the report also found that the combined emissions of the top 20 meat and dairy companies surpass the emissions from entire nations, such as Germany, Canada, Australia, the UK, or France.

Most of the top 35 meat and dairy companies either fail to report emissions entirely, or exclude their supply chain emissions, which account for 80-90 percent of emissions, according to the study, which pointed out that only four of the 35 biggest companies provide comprehensive emissions estimates.

Related: Oil Selloff Gives Trump More Room On Iran

In addition, less than half of the top 35 meat and dairy companies in the world have announced any type of targets to reduce emissions.

“If the growth of the global meat and dairy industry continues as projected, the livestock sector as a whole could consume 80 percent of the planet’s annual greenhouse gas budget by 2050,” the report said.

“The climate community’s attention has been focused on fossil fuel companies. It is time we broadened our focus to include the meat and dairy majors. In the next ten years, we must work together to build a just transition of our agricultural economy that helps restore rural communities and our soil, and sustain our planet,” IATP said.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Leslie Fish on August 05 2018 said:
    I'd like to see the original data on this, and how it was gathered. Cattle, of one species or another, have lived on Earth for millions of years, sometimes in herds of millions, on four out of the six continents, without contributing to "climate change". Carbon dioxide is naturally absorbed by plants -- which inhale CO2 and exhale Oxygen, while animals inhale Oxygen and exhale CO2, an arrangement which has been going on quite neatly for the last billion years or so. In fact, according to the National Academy of Sciences, the US is a CO2 *sink* because of its extensive forests. So is South America. Therefore, the solution is to *plant more trees*.

    It also wouldn't hurt to stop all "factory farming" and allow our livestock to feed on natural pasturage -- grasses, which ordinarily absorb the animals' waste-products and use them for fertilizer.

    This whole argument sounds like a red herring by the oil companies.
  • Jackson on July 19 2018 said:
    Carbon dioxide is a plant fertilizer. There is no greenhouse effect without a glass enclosure. Ignore the propaganda. Global warming has not proceeded for the past twenty five years. The payola climatologists say they lost all their data when asked to share it for confirmation.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play