• 3 minutes 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
  • 6 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 11 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 14 minutes Democrats through impeachment process helped Trump go out of China deal conundrum. Now Trump can safely postpone deal till after November 2020 elections
  • 1 hour Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 23 mins Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 1 hour USA v China. Which is 'best'?
  • 13 hours Wallstreet's "acid test" for Democrat Presidential candidate to receive their financial support . . . Support "Carried Interest"
  • 1 min Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 9 hours My interview on PDVSA Petrocaribe and corruption
  • 23 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 15 hours Quotes from the Widowmaker
  • 21 hours Petroleum Industry Domain Names
James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Largest Hydroelectric Project in the World is Completed, but at What Cost?

On Wednesday the Three Gorges dam in China had its 32nd, 700-megawatt turbine installed, completing the mega-project and bringing its total capacity up to 22.5 gigawatts, making it the largest hydropower installation in the world.

The Three Gorges project has been fully connected to the power grid where it generates 11 percent of China’s total hydroelectric output. Construction started in 1994, and first started generating power for the grid in 2003, since which time it has saved, on average, 200 million tonnes of coal a year.

Zhang Cheng, the manager of China Yangtze Power (the company operating the dam), said that, “the complete operation of all the generators makes the Three Gorges dam the world's largest hydropower project, and the largest base for clean energy.”

However, at a cost of over $38 billion, four times the original estimate, and resulting in at least 1.3 million people being relocated from their homes due to increased risk of earthquakes and landslides in the region, has the price for this particular renewable energy source been too much?

Beijing does not seem to thinks so. Despite the huge costs, the displacement of citizens from their homes, and the risk to the environment they have committed to developing a further 140GW of hydroelectric power by 2015 in order to stay on track to meet their ambitious renewable energy targets.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Helix on July 09 2012 said:
    In the future, we will come to recognize the $38 billion pricetag as cheap. After all, it's a mere 5.4% of the money we gave to the banksters in 2008, not to mention a small fraction of 1% of the amount charged to US taxpayers to prop up the paper assets of the 0.1%.

    At least the Chinese get gigawatts for their $billions. We get a load of hot air and toilet paper for out $trillions.

    Gee, who do you think is getting the better deal?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play