• 4 minutes Why Trump will win the wall fight
  • 9 minutes Climate Change: A Summer of Storms and Smog Is Coming
  • 12 minutes Maduro Asks OPEC For Help Against U.S. Sanctions
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 5 hours is climate change a hoax? $2 Trillion/year worth of programs intended to be handed out by politicians and bureaucrats?
  • 4 hours Ayn Rand Was Right
  • 4 hours Solar and Wind Will Not "Save" the Climate
  • 15 hours Some Good News on Climate Change Maybe
  • 2 hours Indian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. OilIndian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. Oil
  • 6 hours Tension On The Edge: Pakistan Urges U.N. To Intervene Over Kashmir Tension With India
  • 3 hours Sanctions or Support: Despite Sanctions, Iran's Oil Exports Rise In Early 2019
  • 1 day IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 15 hours Expected Breakdown: Israel-Central Europe Summit Canceled After Polish Pullout
  • 7 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 21 hours Cuba Charges U.S. Moving Special Forces, Preparing Venezuelan Intervention
  • 22 hours Oil Prices Bookended for Rest of This Year? Maybe $50 to $80? (My old 'See Saw' theory redux)

LNG Canada Delays Gas Export Terminal Launch Again

LNG tanker

LNG Canada, a Shell-led consortium formed to construct a liquefied natural gas export terminal on the Canadian coast, has for the second time delayed its final investment decision on the US$40-billion project. Big hopes are pinned on the terminal, which is supposed to supply LNG to the Asian markets.

The CEO of the consortium, Andy Calitz, explained the delay with the drop in natural gas prices all over the world and particularly in Asia, which has made the project too costly for the time being. "The whole global energy industry is in turmoil," he noted, adding that representatives of the four partners in the consortium are currently in Canada in order to discuss next moves. LNG Canada features Shell as its largest shareholder with 50 percent, and Mitsubishi Corp, PetroChina, and Korea Gas Corp holding the rest.

LNG has been touted as the next star on the hydrocarbon scene since it’s cheaper and cleaner than crude oil. As a result, a number of large-scale projects have sprouted across the world, including the Gorgon and Wheatstone off the Australian coast, operated by Chevron, Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass terminal, and Italian Eni’s Coral development in Mozambique.

Related: The Fracking Evolution: Better, Safer, Stronger

With so much supply coming on stream and unsteady demand growth, prices have understandably tanked and large projects have become temporarily unviable. Calitz made a point of emphasizing that LNG Canada was not canceled but just delayed, although he added that there was no timeframe for the final investment decision at this point.

The mid-term prospects are not too good. The International Energy Agency expects LNG demand around the world to average 1.5 percent annually through 2021, while the current oversupply persists. That’s down from 2.5 percent, which the IEA forecast last year. This, moreover, could prove too optimistic, because it assumes LNG demand growth in China of 9 percent. If reality fails to live up to expectations, the glut will take longer to disappear.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Bill Simpson on July 12 2016 said:
    With the ones coming online in Australia, and in the Gulf, they keep building more of them, and they might just create an LNG price war, so that they all lose money. Especially since I've been watching a virtual parade of smart finance people say on the various financial TV channels that the era of rapid global economic growth is over. They could be wrong, but solar electricity is getting as cheap as electricity generated using natural gas in a lot of places. I never thought I would live to see that happen. Thanks China. Free fuel from fusion is hard to beat. Too bad the sun is only available 50% of the time. Nuclear will make a comeback. They should save some natural gas for making fertilizer, since people aren't going to stop eating, and plants like fertilizer. You wouldn't want to try and survive in a carbon scarce world. A concentrated source like methane, coal, and petroleum is needed to maintain a high standard of living. No use wasting a finite resource.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News