X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

  • 4 minutes IMPORTANT ARTICLE BY OILPRICE.COM EDITOR - "Naked Short Selling: The Truth Is Much Worse Than You Have Been Told"
  • 5 minutes “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 7 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 9 mins Texas forced to have rolling black outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 11 hours Wednesday Nikki Haley reached out to Trump for meeting at Mar-a-lago. Trump said No ! You blew it Nikki . . .
  • 18 hours NYT:  The Supreme Court’s order (Re:  Trump’s tax returns) set in motion a series of events that could lead to the startling possibility of a criminal trial of a former U.S. president
  • 2 hours The World Economic Forum & Davos - Setting the agenda on fossil fuels, global regulations, etc.
  • 4 hours Retired RAF pilot wins legal challenge over a wind farm
  • 21 hours The latest GOP nonsense on Texas shows us the future Republicans want
  • 2 hours Minerals, Mining and Industrial Ecology
  • 20 hours Disaster looming in UK offshore wind power
  • 1 day The Cyberpandemic has Begun: SolarWinds + FireEye – Gmail & Google services down
  • 22 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
Will New Zealand Ever Unlock Its Oil Potential?

Will New Zealand Ever Unlock Its Oil Potential?

Small oil producer New Zealand…

Judge Deals Blow To Biggest Wind Project In U.S.

American Electric Power Co.’s Wind Catcher project received a blow from an Oklahoma state judge who said the project failed to prove sufficient need. More specifically, administrative law judge Mary Candler said American Electric Power Co. had failed to convince the court that customers should pay for the US$4.5-billion wind farm.

The judge added that the company had also failed at ensuring there were competitive bids for the project, noting that “An excuse of ‘not enough time’ for competitive bidding is not sufficient.” The judge went further, saying AEP’s analysis of cost savings for customers “used unreasonable data” and a “flawed planning process.”

The company had estimated that Oklahoma customers would save US$7 billion over 25 years with Wind Catcher. It also warned that a delay in the project would increase the costs to be passed on to customers by US$2.7 billion. The reason it forewent the competitive bidding process was to beat the expiration date for a federal tax credit for wind power projects in 2020.

The Wind Catcher farm will have a capacity of 2,000MW and will supply power to customers in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. According to the project website, Wind Catcher should bring some US$300 million in property taxes into local community coffers. It is supposed to be completed in 2020, but setbacks like Judge Candler’s ruling could delay it.

Related: OPEC Unfazed As Rivals Boost Oil Output

In response to the ruling, AEP said the judge had ignored evidence supplied by the company, which included a guarantee of customer benefits. The company also added it hoped the Oklahoma Corporation Commission will decide in favor of it.

Oklahoma has become the second-largest wind-producing state in the U.S., but due to a state budget crisis coupled with the oil and gas industry pushing back against wind, it has scrapped some wind energy tax incentives, Christian Science Monitor’s Christa Case Bryant wrote recently. The state pays tens of millions of dollars in wind power industry subsidies and may well have begun to pant under the weight of the bill, which grows as the industry grows.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • stpaulchuck on February 15 2018 said:
    this was all about the subsidy cash. Notice the rush to get a permit before the special allowance went away.

    AEP could care less about the actuals. They just wanted the up front cash from our pockets. In point of fact these blights will never produce the income stated so the local tax payers and customers will get stuck with the left over costs.
  • Robert Jansen on February 13 2018 said:
    When a corporation tries to sell a bill of goods and gets caught, why shouldn't the investors be left holding the bag instead of the customer base? Isn't this how capitalism is supposed to work?
  • Wind kills birds on February 13 2018 said:
    It's time to cut out the taxpayer, let wind begin paying a gross production tax, as the oil industry does.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News