• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 9 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 19 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 11 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 6 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 15 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 9 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 20 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 20 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 8 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 20 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 1 day WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 22 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 1 day California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
Global Energy Advisory – 10th August 2018

Global Energy Advisory – 10th August 2018

U.S. shale producers have been…

Saudi Arabia And Iran Reignite The Oil Price War

Saudi Arabia And Iran Reignite The Oil Price War

As U.S. sanctions on Tehran…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Is Cold Fusion Finally Being Accepted by the Scientific Community?

Back in 1989 two of the greatest electrochemists in the world, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, mad a remarkable announcement. They had witnessed low energy nuclear reactions (LENR) at an atomic level, which generated excess heat. It was the first ever account of cold fusion, a third type of nuclear reaction after fission and fusion.

However, Pons and Fleishman could not consistently reproduce their results, and this led to the rejection of cold fusion, the discrediting of the two scientists by the general scientific community.

Cold fusion became a complete dead end. Two different Department of Energy panels dismissed cold fusion theories and recommended against creating a program to study it. No one would risk putting major funding into any research projects, and no reputable scientists were willing to risk their reputations by pursuing a science that many considered equal to alchemy.

However, following recent LENR demonstrations at reputable institutions such as MIT, the University of Missouri, and the University of Bologna, as well as presentations by the world's largest instrument companies, National Instruments, a report by the European Commission's research and development centre that suggests LENR has its place in the future of renewable energy, and most impressively of all, the fact that NASA is interested and reportedly filed two LENR patents last year; serious companies are now considering the possibilities of LENR and investing in certain research projects. There are rumours that Boeing is working with NASA to test LENR powered aircraft.

The promise of discovering a clean, green, safe, and (due to the fact that it is fuelled by the most abundant metal and gas on the planet, nickel and hydrogen) cheap renewable energy source is causing many investors and scientists to overcome their previous reluctance and enter the field.

I am not saying that the companies such as Boeing or National Instruments, or agencies such as NASA, the US Navy, or the DOE will publically admit to spending large amounts on cold fusion research. In fact the Navy had to shut down its LENR research in California after a news report attracted unwanted public attention.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • cassus on March 04 2013 said:
    @Menachem Began:
    Boeing has a long and impressive history of research in conjunction with NASA. Breaking the sound barrier, first mach 3 flight (if I remember correctly) and stuff like that. It makes perfect sense that Boeing is in on this from day 1. They're not losing money by doing so either, they get funding for research as well as a leg up on the competition.

    It would be foolish to not include Boeing on this.
  • Menachem Began on August 19 2012 said:
    "...Boeing is working with NASA to test LENR powered aircraft..."

    That makes zero sense. Implementing aircraft powered by LENR is essentially trivial....after LENR is proven practical. For this reason, the rumor that Boeing is involved in LENR must be false. It would make as much sense if Sony would be working on a LENR powered TV.
  • Mark Goldes on August 10 2012 said:
    Cold fusion was never totally abandoned by the scientific community. But, it was only a small, underfunded group that continued.

    See lenr-canr.org for the history and extensive literature.

    This opens the door to Cheap Green energy and is likely to play an increasing large role.

    Such systems may begin to be called Quantum Reactors, a new name suggested by the CEO at National Instruments.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News