• 6 minutes Will the trade war hurt US project builds? Not if the US does it right.
  • 12 minutes OIl Targets from Experts to $300, vs. imho $52
  • 18 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 7 hours Germany: We Can No Longer Fully Rely On U.S. White House
  • 10 hours U.S. Challenges 5 WTO Members imposing Illegal Tariffs Against U.S. Products
  • 3 hours Venezuela, the largest oil reserve in the world, faces deep shortages of motor oil
  • 5 hours Well from $74 we hit 67.xx now what?
  • 7 hours Chile Becomes The Latest Country To Commit To 100% Renewables
  • 3 hours Does S Arabia Have 2 Mln Barrels in Spare Capacity?
  • 2 hours Where 3 Million Electric Vehicle Batteries Will Go When They Retire?
  • 7 hours Trade War of 1930s, Extended the Great Depression
  • 12 hours Ireland Exits Fossil Fuels
  • 3 hours Rio Tinto Says $4-Million Goodbye to Coal
  • 7 hours Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 11 hours Is Libya the current Iran for oil markets?
  • 9 hours Apple's $300 fund in China
  • 10 hours Iran's President Warns Over U.S. Push For Countries To Stop Buying Oil From Iran
  • 10 hours Total Trade War: U.S. Threatens Tariffs On $200 BN of China Goods
Why Nuclear Energy Is Critical For Russia

Why Nuclear Energy Is Critical For Russia

Russia is renowned for its…

IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030

Fatih Birol

Despite the fact that part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) has been declared open to drilling, low oil prices and abundance of onshore shale deposits makes the Arctic currently less attractive for development, the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), Fatih Birol, has told a U.S. Senate committee, adding that he didn’t expect substantial volumes of oil from that region before 2030.

“With the current context, it will be difficult to believe that there will be a substantial amount of oil production coming from that region before 2030, unless we see some surprises in the markets,” Birol told the Senate panel, as carried by Axios.

“We’re going to start drilling in ANWR — one of the largest oil reserves in the world — that for 40 years this country was unable to touch,” U.S. President Donald Trump said after the passing of the tax overhaul that also opened part of ANWR to oil and gas drilling.

But oil companies may not be rushing to drill in northern Alaska, due to the harsh conditions and the high costs associated with venturing into a frontier area where the drilling season is short and development costs high, the Houston Chronicle’s James Osborne writes.

Related: Is The Rig Count Still Relevant?

While IEA’s executive director Birol was not too optimistic about quick oil from ANWR, he said in his written testimony to the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Tuesday that even still, the U.S. would become the undisputed global oil and gas leader

“By the mid-2020s, the United States also becomes the world’s largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter and a few years later a net exporter of oil – assuming increasingly stringent fuel economy standards are enacted,” the IEA’s chief said.

“With the United States accounting for 80% of the increase in global oil supply to 2025 and maintaining near-term downward pressure on prices, our projections suggest that the world’s consumers are not yet ready to say goodbye to the era of oil,” Birol noted.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • caribousteaks on January 18 2018 said:
    Pretty much non news. Like Birol knows how much oil is in the ground there? His comment is both baseless and pointless. 10-02 production will take place only if substantial quantities of oil are found. All signs are there that it exists but as anyone who knows the North Slope, what matters is how much and can you get it out of the ground. Legal lawsuits by greens and possible roadblocks put up by future D presidents will certainly cause delay or could cancel exploration outright. The fact is though if the industry was let in tomorrow and prospective plays were discovered oil could be brought to Pt. Thompson and TAPS within a year. All the transportation infrastructure already exists. What is needed is a 3D seismic survey and a lease sale and a discovery. Saying 2030 or any other year is blowing smoke and truly unintelligent commentary. Even more so given its from the IEA and yet Alaskan oil will be consumed in Cherry Pt. and Long Beach not on the world market.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News