• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 27 mins Oil prices going down
  • 1 hour Oil and Trade War
  • 4 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 15 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 1 hour When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 5 hours Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 14 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 5 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 14 mins Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 6 hours Correlation Between Oil Sweet Spots and Real Estate Hot Spots
  • 1 hour venezuala oil crisis
  • 4 hours Russia and Saudi Arabia to have a chat on oil during FIFA World Cup - report
  • 52 mins Germany Orders Daimler to Recall 774,000 Diesel Cars in Europe
  • 14 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 24 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 24 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC

Breaking News:

Egypt Raises Fuel Prices By Up To 50%

Explosion Possible at the Most Contaminated Nuclear Site in the US

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington is the most contaminated nuclear site in the US. First developed in the 1940’s as part of the Manhattan Project that saw the construction of the first atomic bomb, the site has cost the government billions in dollars in clean-up efforts over the years (approximately $2 billion a year at the moment), and now the nuclear safety board has warned that the waste tanks actually pose a risk of explosion.

Federal officials who monitor the site have said that for a while six of the tanks have been leaking their radioactive waste into the soil, and contaminating the ground water in the area. Then on top of that the nuclear safety board, which is focussing on nuclear contamination at sites around the country in the build-up to the confirmation of a new Energy Secretary, has warned that a dangerous buildup of hydrogen gas within the tanks creates a serious possibility of explosion. Work is being carried out to add monitoring systems and ventilation to the tanks, which will hopefully reduce the risk.

Related article: Nuclear Powered Light Bulbs

The board stated that “all the double-shell tanks contain waste that continuously generates some flammable gas. This gas will eventually reach flammable conditions if adequate ventilation is not provided.”

Once the work on the tanks has been completed the next step is to encase them in a more permanent manner for long-term disposal. Only then can the rest of the plant be completed; yes after 60 years it is still in the construction phase, having cost over $12.3 billion it is still only half built.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • james martin on April 09 2013 said:
    When I worked in the industry I was amazed they use hydrogen gas for cooling! Seemed and still seems stupid to me!
  • Janko E. Svarc B. on April 08 2013 said:
    $2 billion (two thousand million dollars) a year just in cleanup efforts? I suppose we should all be grateful nuclear energy is so cost effective.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News