• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 9 hours Maybe 8 to 10 "good" years left in oil industry * UAE model for Economic Deversification * Others spent oil billions on funding terrorism, wars, suppressing dissidents, building nukes * Too late now
  • 4 hours OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 56 mins Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 15 hours Russia Accuses U.S. Of Stoking Tensions With Missile Test
  • 6 hours What to tell my students
  • 6 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 18 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 7 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 10 hours TRUMP'S FORMER 'CHRISTIAN LIAISON' SAYS DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER WAS GOD'S PUNISHMENT FOR OBAMA ISRAEL DIVISION
  • 2 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 1 day In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 22 hours Get First Access To The Oilprice App!
  • 11 hours Flaring is at Record Highs in Texas
Shale Pioneer Hamm Calls For Production Slowdown

Shale Pioneer Hamm Calls For Production Slowdown

U.S. shale producers need to…

Explosion Possible at the Most Contaminated Nuclear Site in the US

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington is the most contaminated nuclear site in the US. First developed in the 1940’s as part of the Manhattan Project that saw the construction of the first atomic bomb, the site has cost the government billions in dollars in clean-up efforts over the years (approximately $2 billion a year at the moment), and now the nuclear safety board has warned that the waste tanks actually pose a risk of explosion.

Federal officials who monitor the site have said that for a while six of the tanks have been leaking their radioactive waste into the soil, and contaminating the ground water in the area. Then on top of that the nuclear safety board, which is focussing on nuclear contamination at sites around the country in the build-up to the confirmation of a new Energy Secretary, has warned that a dangerous buildup of hydrogen gas within the tanks creates a serious possibility of explosion. Work is being carried out to add monitoring systems and ventilation to the tanks, which will hopefully reduce the risk.

Related article: Nuclear Powered Light Bulbs

The board stated that “all the double-shell tanks contain waste that continuously generates some flammable gas. This gas will eventually reach flammable conditions if adequate ventilation is not provided.”

Once the work on the tanks has been completed the next step is to encase them in a more permanent manner for long-term disposal. Only then can the rest of the plant be completed; yes after 60 years it is still in the construction phase, having cost over $12.3 billion it is still only half built.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • james martin on April 09 2013 said:
    When I worked in the industry I was amazed they use hydrogen gas for cooling! Seemed and still seems stupid to me!
  • Janko E. Svarc B. on April 08 2013 said:
    $2 billion (two thousand million dollars) a year just in cleanup efforts? I suppose we should all be grateful nuclear energy is so cost effective.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play