• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 8 minutes What Can Bring Oil Down to $20?
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 2 hours Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 4 hours Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 38 mins Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 4 hours Instead Of A Withdrawal, An Initiative: Iran Hopes To Agree With Russia And Turkey on Syrian Constitution Forum
  • 23 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 2 hours Water. The new oil?
  • 1 day Quebecans Snub Noses at Alberta's Oil but Buy More Gasoline
  • 2 days OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 2 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 2 days $867 billion farm bill passed
  • 2 days Contradictory: Euro Zone Takes Step To Deeper Integration, Key Issues Unresolved
  • 2 days WTO So Set Up Panels To Rule On U.S. Tariff Disputes
  • 2 days IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019

Breaking News:

Shell in Talks To Buy Endeavor Energy

Oil Markets Stuck As Hedge Funds Remain Bearish

Oil Markets Stuck As Hedge Funds Remain Bearish

Crude prices haven’t staged much…

Why Iran’s Positive OPEC Spin Won’t Last

Why Iran’s Positive OPEC Spin Won’t Last

Tensions are reaching a boiling…

Explosion Possible at the Most Contaminated Nuclear Site in the US

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington is the most contaminated nuclear site in the US. First developed in the 1940’s as part of the Manhattan Project that saw the construction of the first atomic bomb, the site has cost the government billions in dollars in clean-up efforts over the years (approximately $2 billion a year at the moment), and now the nuclear safety board has warned that the waste tanks actually pose a risk of explosion.

Federal officials who monitor the site have said that for a while six of the tanks have been leaking their radioactive waste into the soil, and contaminating the ground water in the area. Then on top of that the nuclear safety board, which is focussing on nuclear contamination at sites around the country in the build-up to the confirmation of a new Energy Secretary, has warned that a dangerous buildup of hydrogen gas within the tanks creates a serious possibility of explosion. Work is being carried out to add monitoring systems and ventilation to the tanks, which will hopefully reduce the risk.

Related article: Nuclear Powered Light Bulbs

The board stated that “all the double-shell tanks contain waste that continuously generates some flammable gas. This gas will eventually reach flammable conditions if adequate ventilation is not provided.”

Once the work on the tanks has been completed the next step is to encase them in a more permanent manner for long-term disposal. Only then can the rest of the plant be completed; yes after 60 years it is still in the construction phase, having cost over $12.3 billion it is still only half built.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • james martin on April 09 2013 said:
    When I worked in the industry I was amazed they use hydrogen gas for cooling! Seemed and still seems stupid to me!
  • Janko E. Svarc B. on April 08 2013 said:
    $2 billion (two thousand million dollars) a year just in cleanup efforts? I suppose we should all be grateful nuclear energy is so cost effective.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News