• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 8 minutes What Can Bring Oil Down to $20?
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 4 hours Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 5 hours Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 1 hour Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 6 hours Instead Of A Withdrawal, An Initiative: Iran Hopes To Agree With Russia And Turkey on Syrian Constitution Forum
  • 1 day U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 3 hours Water. The new oil?
  • 1 day Quebecans Snub Noses at Alberta's Oil but Buy More Gasoline
  • 4 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 4 mins USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 2 days OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 2 days IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 2 days $867 billion farm bill passed
  • 2 days Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
Libya’s NOC Won’t Pay ‘Ransom’ For Biggest Oil Field

Libya’s NOC Won’t Pay ‘Ransom’ For Biggest Oil Field

Libya’s National Oil Corporation said…

European Parliament Prepares to Discuss Future of Biofuels in the EU

Policies concerning biofuels in the EU is a controversial topic, but this week members of the European parliament (MEPs) are preparing to tackle the subject and clear any doubts surrounding the future of the sector.

Currently the EU has a set target of gaining 10% of its transport fuel from green sources by 2020, however questions are being asked over whether the biofuels contributing to the achievement of this target are really leading to lower greenhouse gas emissions, or whether the drive to achieve the target is actually detrimental to the environment.

MEPs will vote on introducing limits to the amount of biofuels produced from crops that can be used to help towards the 10% target, and whether emissions produced whilst clearing areas such as rainforests, wetlands, and grasslands, known as indirect land use change (ILUC), should be taken into account when determining the emissions produced from using biofuels.

If the MEPs vote to include ILUC emissions in the biofuel calculations, most forms of biodiesel could become obsolete in terms of the EUs 10% target, as they will create higher emissions than the fossil fuels they are intended to replace. Some within the industry argue that, due to that fact that biodiesel accounts for about 75% of EU biofuels, using ILUC emission figures would make attaining the 10% target virtually impossible. They claim that by introducing overly strict standards the industry could be heavily damaged, risking the jobs of 70,000 people now employed in biofuels throughout the EU, and the €20 billion a year that the industry contributes to the EU Growth Domestic Product.

Related article: Algae Produces more Fat for Biofuels when Starved

There are even some environmental groups that have asked the EU to completely abandon the 10% target, complaining that it could only be achieved by importing huge amounts of biofuels from outside of the region, and that it is wrong for the EU to offer subsidies of €6 billion a year to an industry that may produce higher carbon emissions.

The European Parliament’s Environment Committee (ENVI) has suggested that biofuels should not be allowed to count for more than 5.5 percent of the 2020 target, and that the ILUC calculations should be immediately included in order to prevent the production of unsustainable biofuels.

The Industry, Research and Energy Committee (ITRE) has asked that biofuels account for no more than 6.5 percent, with the ILUC calculations coming into effect in 2016. They also want a target of two percent to be supplied by advanced biofuels that do not compete for crop land, hoping that this will encourage investment and expansion in this sector.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News