• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 11 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 8 days Does Toyota Know Something That We Don’t?
  • 2 days America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 7 days World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 9 days China is using Chinese Names of Cities on their Border with Russia.
  • 11 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 11 days OPINION: Putin’s Genocidal Myth A scholarly treatise on the thousands of years of Ukrainian history. RCW
  • 11 days CHINA Economy IMPLODING - Fastest Price Fall in 14 Years & Stock Market Crashes to 5 Year Low
  • 10 days CHINA Economy Disaster - Employee Shortages, Retirement Age, Birth Rate & Ageing Population
  • 5 mins Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 1 day How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 11 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
  • 11 days "(Another) Putin Critic 'Falls' Out Of Window, Dies"

Environmental Organisations Continue to Profit from the Death of the Planet

A relatively young green movement has taken the world by storm, demanding that public interest institutions divest their holdings from fossil fuel stocks. Originating in the US, chapters have opened up in more than 100 cities and 300 campuses around the country; it has even crossed the Atlantic to the UK where it is known as “Fossil Free UK”.

Launched just six months ago, already four US colleges have pledged to divest their endowments from fossil fuel stocks and bonds, and at the end of April 10 US cities also signed up to the idea, promising similar commitments.

The Go Fossil Free movement states: “If it is wrong to wreck the climate, then it is wrong to profit from that wreckage. We believe that educational and religious institutions, city and state governments, and other institutions that serve the public good should divest from fossil fuels.”

Related article: Politics Still Rules the Climate Change Debate in the US

The intent is a good one, but the statement misses a rather important, and possibly obvious, target, environmental organisations. They spend billions every year trying to cut carbon emissions, and slow the effects of global warming, but where exactly do they make that money? It would seem obvious that pro-green groups would want to ensure that the money they use to save the planet was not generated in a way that dooms the planet.

But then maybe the environmental organisations are in no hurry to renounce their fossil fuel investments. Some of the largest and most powerful environmental organisations have long been funded by the fossil fuel sector, even so much as deliberately leading the climate movement down dead ends such as; carbon trading, carbon offsets, and the idea of using natural gas as a bridge fuel, all creating an illusion of progress whilst really allowing the fossil fuel companies to continue business as normal.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News