• 4 minutes Get First Access To The Oilprice App!
  • 7 minutes Blame Oil Price or EVs for Car Market Crash? Auto Recession Has Started
  • 11 minutes Japanese Refiners Load First Iran Oil Cargo Since U.S. Sanctions
  • 13 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 1 hour *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 6 hours Oceans "Under Fire" Of Plastic Trash
  • 2 hours Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 11 mins Making Fun of EV Owners: ICE-ing Trend?
  • 2 hours Is Natural Gas Renewable? I say yes it is.
  • 22 hours How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 9 hours Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 11 hours Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 17 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 23 hours Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 16 hours Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 13 hours UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 5 hours Orphan Wells
Alt Text

Is Carbon Capture The Only Option We Have?

Stopping coal use within the…

Alt Text

Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Set New Record

The average concentration of atmospheric…

Alt Text

Refiners Aren’t To Blame For Climate Change

Big Oil is often criticized…

Futurity

Futurity

Futurity covers research news from the top universities in the US, UK, Canada and Australia

More Info

Trending Discussions

Politics Still Rules the Climate Change Debate in the US

US residents who believe in the scientific consensus on global warming are more likely to support government action to curb emissions, regardless of political party. But, there’s still a divide.

A political split remains on the existence of climate change despite the fact that the vast majority of scientists believe it is real, says Aaron M. McCright, associate professor in Lyman Briggs College and the Department of Sociology at Michigan State University.

The study, in the journal Climatic Change, is one of the first to examine the influence of political orientation on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action to reduce emissions.

Related article: Climate Change Debate Heats Up, Threatens Shale Boom

“The more people believe scientists agree about climate change, the more willing they are to support government action, even when their party affiliation is taken into account,” McCright says. “But there is still a political split on levels of perceived scientific agreement, in that fewer Republicans and conservatives than Democrats and liberals believe there is a scientific consensus.”

McCright and colleagues analyzed a Gallup survey of 1,024 adults who were asked about their views on climate change.

The results reaffirm the success of what McCright calls the “denial machine”—an organized movement to undercut the scientific reality of climate change during the past two decades.

McCright says the first step in dealing with climate change is getting both sides of the political spectrum to accept the scientific consensus. At that point, he says, policymakers can go about the task of coming up with an approach to combat it.

Related article: The Beijing Syndrome: China Begins to Care for the Environment

He says both government and industry should be involved in that effort.

“Certainly we can’t solve all our problems with global warming through government regulations—in fact, for some problems, government regulations might make it worse,” McCright says. “And so we need a combination of market-based solutions and government regulations.”

By. Andy Henion




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News