• 3 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 5 minutes Could Tesla Buy GM?
  • 11 minutes Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 17 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 14 hours OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 6 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 45 mins Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 34 mins And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 20 hours Congrats: 4 journalists and a newspaper are Time’s Person of the Year
  • 18 mins Alberta Cuts Push Prices Too High
  • 21 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 17 hours USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 1 day Permian Suicide
  • 1 day Asian stocks down
  • 2 days Trump accuses Google Of Hiding 'Fair Media' Coverage of him
  • 2 days GOODBYE FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE!!
The Next Big Development In Offshore Oil & Gas

The Next Big Development In Offshore Oil & Gas

German tech company Siemens announced…

EPA Scraps Methane Emission Reporting Rule

Fire

The Environmental Protection Agency has removed an Obama-era rule that requires oil and gas companies to report methane emissions from oilfields – a rule that had prompted complaints from 11 oil and gas-producing states that argued it required too much work.

The EPA’s new boss, climate change skeptic and former Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, said the change was effective immediately, adding he will go on to assess whether the additional information that EPA required from energy companies under its previous management is indeed necessary to collect.

Pruitt commented that the withdrawal of the methane emission reporting rule was part of the new EPA’s efforts to improve its relationship with state governments. Environmentalist groups were quick to condemn the move, arguing that under Pruitt, the EPA will turn into an organization serving the oil and gas industry. Pruitt was a vocal opponent to EPA’s regulations over the last eight years.

The rule on methane emission reporting, part of efforts to combat climate change by reducing said emissions, was issued in a directive from the EPA in November last year. Besides these reports, the directive also called on 15,000 oil and gas companies to report the numbers and types of equipment at their onshore production sites.

Related: The EV Myth – Electric Car Threat To Oil Is Wildly Overstated

The justification for this directive was that the data would help the regulator develop regulations aimed at cutting methane emissions—methane is a much more powerful greenhouse agent than carbon monoxide, and the oil and gas industry is the biggest emitter of the gas.

Some oil companies are already teaming up with tech developers to better manage the methane emissions at their fields. Besides the environmental benefits, this is financially justifiable as well. According to the Environmental Defense Fund, an environmental NPO focusing on curbing methane emissions, the U.S. oil and gas industry is losing US$2 billion annually in undetected methane leaks.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Lee James on March 04 2017 said:
    Might as well do away with the methane reporting. No one seemed to be paying attention to fugitive methane anyhow. Just dump it for free?! A lot of the gas in the field is deemed "uneconomic" to capture. Leaks will usually pass the smell test, although airborne infrared imaging suggest it accumulates quite a bit in some regions, like the Bakken in S.D.

    Short-term profiteering rules under our new administration!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News