• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 7 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 11 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 14 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 8 mins Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 3 hours Prosecutors Fine Bosch 90 Million Euros For Emissions Cheating Role
  • 10 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
  • 25 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 3 hours Apple Boycott in China
  • 10 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 3 hours California's Oil Industry Collapses Despite Shale Boom
  • 1 hour Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 19 hours Apple Bid To Buy Tesla in 2013 For $240 a Share
  • 1 hour IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 4 days Some Good News on Climate Change Maybe
  • 1 hour IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 2 hours Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS
Bearish EIA Data Sends Oil Lower

Bearish EIA Data Sends Oil Lower

Oil fell on Wednesday morning,…

How Trump And Xi Killed The Oil Rally

How Trump And Xi Killed The Oil Rally

The U.S.-China trade war appears…

District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating

Dakota Access Pipeline

The Dakota Access oil pipeline can continue shipping oil from North Dakota’s Bakken fields to Illinois despite protests, U.S. district judge James Boasberg ruled in the latest chapter of the saga around the project.

Four months ago, Boasberg ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to carry out a new environmental impact review since the original one failed to adequately address the consequences of a potential oil spill on the fishing and hunting rights of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which leads the protests against a section of the pipeline that is adjacent to tribal lands.

The US$3.8-billion, 470,000-bpd pipeline started carrying crude in May, and after the judge’s latest ruling will continue to do so at least until next April, while the Army Corps conducts its review. The Standing Rock sued the Army Corps. for its approval of the pipeline, using the argument that it would contaminate its main water source, the Missouri River.

The company that built the Dakota Access, Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP), has countered the tribe’s claims by pointing out that there are several other pipelines that already under Lake Oahe that have been there for decades and have drawn no protests. DAPL runs parallel to an existing pipeline, the Northern Border Pipeline, and does not actually pass through tribal lands.

Related: World’s No.1 Oil Trader: U.S. To See Final Oil Output Spike In 2018

In June the plaintiffs asked the court to suspend the operation of Dakota Access until the environmental review is ready, but Boasberg ruled that suspension is not the best course of action: now that the Army Corps. was conducting the environmental review with the pipeline in operation, they could prove that an oil spill would not have adverse effects on the environment.

“The dispute over the Dakota Access Pipeline has now taken nearly as many twists and turns as the 1,200-mile pipeline itself,” Judge Boasberg said in his latest ruling, adding that the flaws discovered in the Army Corps. original review were not “fundamental or incurable”.

The judge cautioned the Army Corps., however, to not treat the review as mere bureaucracy. If the plaintiffs are still unhappy with the review after its second version, they would have the chance to voice their grievances next year.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News