• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 14 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 18 minutes California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 2 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 6 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 3 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 4 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 9 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 5 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 13 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 4 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 12 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 15 hours Merkel, Putin to discuss Syria, Ukraine, Nord Stream 2
  • 18 hours What Turkey Sanctions Are Really About
  • 18 hours < sigh > $90 Oil Is A Very Real Possibility
  • 16 hours Saudi Production Cut or Demand Drop?
Why The U.S. Won’t Sanction Venezuela’s Oil

Why The U.S. Won’t Sanction Venezuela’s Oil

Rumors of the U.S. government…

Philippines Cracks Down On Fuel Pirates

Philippines Cracks Down On Fuel Pirates

Though fuel smuggling in Southeast…

District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating

Dakota Access Pipeline

The Dakota Access oil pipeline can continue shipping oil from North Dakota’s Bakken fields to Illinois despite protests, U.S. district judge James Boasberg ruled in the latest chapter of the saga around the project.

Four months ago, Boasberg ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to carry out a new environmental impact review since the original one failed to adequately address the consequences of a potential oil spill on the fishing and hunting rights of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which leads the protests against a section of the pipeline that is adjacent to tribal lands.

The US$3.8-billion, 470,000-bpd pipeline started carrying crude in May, and after the judge’s latest ruling will continue to do so at least until next April, while the Army Corps conducts its review. The Standing Rock sued the Army Corps. for its approval of the pipeline, using the argument that it would contaminate its main water source, the Missouri River.

The company that built the Dakota Access, Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP), has countered the tribe’s claims by pointing out that there are several other pipelines that already under Lake Oahe that have been there for decades and have drawn no protests. DAPL runs parallel to an existing pipeline, the Northern Border Pipeline, and does not actually pass through tribal lands.

Related: World’s No.1 Oil Trader: U.S. To See Final Oil Output Spike In 2018

In June the plaintiffs asked the court to suspend the operation of Dakota Access until the environmental review is ready, but Boasberg ruled that suspension is not the best course of action: now that the Army Corps. was conducting the environmental review with the pipeline in operation, they could prove that an oil spill would not have adverse effects on the environment.

“The dispute over the Dakota Access Pipeline has now taken nearly as many twists and turns as the 1,200-mile pipeline itself,” Judge Boasberg said in his latest ruling, adding that the flaws discovered in the Army Corps. original review were not “fundamental or incurable”.

The judge cautioned the Army Corps., however, to not treat the review as mere bureaucracy. If the plaintiffs are still unhappy with the review after its second version, they would have the chance to voice their grievances next year.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News