• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 3 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 1 hour The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 14 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 8 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 36 mins Trump vs. MbS
  • 6 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 14 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 12 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 8 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 2 hours Coal remains a major source of power in Europe.
  • 1 hour EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 11 hours Nopec Sherman act legislation
  • 4 hours Poland signs 20-year deal on U.S. LNG supplies
The Oil Markets Are At A Confusing Crossroads

The Oil Markets Are At A Confusing Crossroads

The latest IEA report suggests…

Disappearance Of Saudi Journalist Could Rock Oil Markets

Disappearance Of Saudi Journalist Could Rock Oil Markets

The disappearance of Saudi journalist…

District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating

Dakota Access Pipeline

The Dakota Access oil pipeline can continue shipping oil from North Dakota’s Bakken fields to Illinois despite protests, U.S. district judge James Boasberg ruled in the latest chapter of the saga around the project.

Four months ago, Boasberg ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to carry out a new environmental impact review since the original one failed to adequately address the consequences of a potential oil spill on the fishing and hunting rights of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which leads the protests against a section of the pipeline that is adjacent to tribal lands.

The US$3.8-billion, 470,000-bpd pipeline started carrying crude in May, and after the judge’s latest ruling will continue to do so at least until next April, while the Army Corps conducts its review. The Standing Rock sued the Army Corps. for its approval of the pipeline, using the argument that it would contaminate its main water source, the Missouri River.

The company that built the Dakota Access, Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP), has countered the tribe’s claims by pointing out that there are several other pipelines that already under Lake Oahe that have been there for decades and have drawn no protests. DAPL runs parallel to an existing pipeline, the Northern Border Pipeline, and does not actually pass through tribal lands.

Related: World’s No.1 Oil Trader: U.S. To See Final Oil Output Spike In 2018

In June the plaintiffs asked the court to suspend the operation of Dakota Access until the environmental review is ready, but Boasberg ruled that suspension is not the best course of action: now that the Army Corps. was conducting the environmental review with the pipeline in operation, they could prove that an oil spill would not have adverse effects on the environment.

“The dispute over the Dakota Access Pipeline has now taken nearly as many twists and turns as the 1,200-mile pipeline itself,” Judge Boasberg said in his latest ruling, adding that the flaws discovered in the Army Corps. original review were not “fundamental or incurable”.

The judge cautioned the Army Corps., however, to not treat the review as mere bureaucracy. If the plaintiffs are still unhappy with the review after its second version, they would have the chance to voice their grievances next year.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News