• 8 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 10 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 12 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 13 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 14 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 15 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 16 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 18 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 19 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 20 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 1 day British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Is The Aramco IPO On The Brink Of Collapse?

Is The Aramco IPO On The Brink Of Collapse?

Conflicting news suggests that Saudi…

UK Oil And Gas Costs To Rise 100% If Brexit Fails

UK Oil And Gas Costs To Rise 100% If Brexit Fails

Brexit negotiators’ failure to secure…

Dispersants Make Oil Spills 52 Times more Toxic

Dispersants Make Oil Spills 52 Times more Toxic

A new study, published in the journal Environmental Pollution, has found that the dispersants used to clean up oil spills actually make the entire situation much worse and cause far more damage to the environment than the crude oil itself.

As part of the clean up proceedings for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill more than 2 million gallons of the oil dispersants Corexit 9527A and 9500A were dumped into the Gulf of Mexico in order to break the oil up into tiny droplets; a move that is intended to speed up the degradation of the oil and prevent it from reaching shore.

The study has worryingly discovered that when Corexit is mixed with oil it becomes up to 52 times more toxic than the original oil on its own.

Related Article: Offshore Drill Rigs at Threat from Computer Viruses

Terry Snell, a biologist at Georgia Tech and co-author of the study, said that “there is a synergistic interaction between crude oil and the dispersant that makes it more toxic.” The dispersant works in as much as it makes the oil effectively disappear, but the microscopic particles that are left are “more toxic to the planktonic food chain.”

Snell explained that “the levels in the Gulf were toxic, and seriously toxic. That probably put a big dent in the planktonic food web for some extended period of time, but nobody really made the measurements to figure out the impact.”

Related Article: Energy Efficiency May Help Pay for Mortgages

Plankton is the base food source of the ocean, the bottom of the food chain. If the population of plankton in the gulf is killed off enough then the population of larger animals will be effected, all the way up to whales.

The dispersants put the oil out of site. ‘Out of sight, out of mind.’ The public forgot about the oil once they could no longer see it; but it doesn’t mean that it is gone, that the ocean is clean and safe for life.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Ann H Csonka on July 01 2013 said:
    @ Robert: "…they (our government) know exactly what "they" are doing! That was the intent sink the oil using Corexit. Does anyone know that BP had a contract with a company called mopsolutions… The mess had to be cleaned up quick, so they sunk it."

    Our Government DIRECTED BP to NOT USE COREXIT. BP continued to use it anyway – of course. WHY? BP’s fines were based on the amount of oil spilled. THINK. Who had the biggest reason to “disappear the evidence”? …with no serious concern for ongoing effects to Gulf seafloor/other ecosystems or long-term resource damage!! BP gained nothing except higher fines by mopping/salvaging oil.
    The reason for sinking it was NOT to ease concerns by quick cleanup. Scientists knew ezxaxtly the effets of Corexit.
    I really get tired of folks hanging blame on the government.
  • Tony K on May 19 2013 said:
    Robert. It's ok. It's just the web. But yes we all agree all is not right and all is not what it seems.
  • Robert on May 07 2013 said:
    Nick, do you have a hard time reading my post?
    I did not allude to the fact that corexit is not harmful! I was being facetious when I said
    "Mmmm corexit gulf shrimp."
    I've had my hands plenty oily and I know for a fact what
    I'm talking about, I don't need to tell you where you can still find oil do I?
    Don't have to be snide or cocky do you?
  • Nick s on May 07 2013 said:
    Next time Robert

    Come get your hands a lil oily before you go acting like you know what really is going on.
  • Nick s on May 07 2013 said:
    I call bullsh*t Robert. These Chemicals where very harmful. I know from first hand experience from being part of the bp clean up my self.
  • Robert on May 07 2013 said:
    Henry, they (our government) know exactly what "they"
    are doing! That was the intent sink the oil using Corexit. Does anyone know that BP had a contract with a
    company called mopsolutions which used all natural product to soak up oil in water, once the oil is soaked into the solution, it is picked up and the oil can be squeezed out and reused.
    Check this out yourself. The mess had to be cleaned up quick, so they sunk it.
    Don't you just love the commercials advertising how clean the gulf is and how wonderful the food is.
    Mmmm corexit gulf shrimp.
  • r3t0dd on May 07 2013 said:
    Has Joe Barton (R-Etard) apologized to BP for this article being published yet?
  • Frank on May 07 2013 said:
    Money talks! And we can not leave our dependence from oil, as the richest 1%want to keep their lifestyle
  • ChrisBijsters on May 07 2013 said:

    I know what they're doing. Making money. That's all that counts and as long as the public doesn't make too much of a fuss about it, destroying nature is not a problem.
  • @Henry on May 07 2013 said:
    You can't test for everything.
  • HenryPaul on May 07 2013 said:
    These are adults making these decisions. How did they not test this first? It makes you realise how stupid everything is when things such as this can be dealt with on a whim. Who actually knows what there doing?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News