• 3 minutes Will Iron-Air batteries REALLY change things?
  • 7 minutes Natural gas mobility for heavy duty trucks
  • 11 minutes NordStream2
  • 8 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 6 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 18 hours Evergrande is going Belly Up.
  • 8 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 24 hours Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 4 days Poland Expands LNG Powered Trucking and Fueling Stations
  • 4 days World’s Biggest Battery In California Overheats, Shuts Down
  • 3 days The unexpected loss of output from wind turbines compels UK to turn to an alternative; It's not what you think!
  • 12 hours Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 3 days Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 3 days Extraction of gasoline from crude oil.

Democrats Propose Big Oil Polluters’ Fund

A group of Senate Democrats has proposed a fund of $500 billion, to be filled by Big Oil polluters over 10 years, “to require the biggest polluters to begin paying their fair share for a just clean energy transition,” according to a press release by one of the group, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen.

“Our idea is simple: those who pollute should pay to help clean up the mess they caused – and those who polluted the most should pay the most. This bill will ensure the costs of climate change are no longer borne solely by the American people – and instead require big corporate polluters to pay part of the clean-up bill,” Van Hollen said.

Others from the group, which includes Bernie Sanders, Ed Markey, Sheldon Whitehouse, Elizabeth Warren, and Jeff Merkley, commented that the Big Oil industry has been essentially profiting from polluting the country for decades, and that it was now time for it to start paying for this.

Senator Van Hollen also said that only the biggest polluters in the oil industry would be targeted, after the Treasury Department and the Environmental Protection Agency identify them. Specific company names were not listed, but Van Hollen said there would be about 25 to 30 companies that would be required to contribute to the fund.

He also mentioned “companies like ExxonMobil, BP, Shell, and Chevron” as the biggest polluters, saying they would have to shell out some $5-6 billion annually for the fund. 

“Responsibility to pay would be based on a strict liability standard – there is no requirement to prove negligence or intentional wrongdoing. The proposal does not assign blame for specific damages – it simply ensures that these companies contribute to the solution,” Van Hollen’s press release explained.

The sponsors of the Polluters Pay Climate Fund bill are hoping to have it voted on later this year as part of broader climate change-related legislation. 

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Patrick King on August 05 2021 said:
    Won't the oil consuming public end up paying as big oil companies increase prices to pass along the cost to consumers? Unless companies' contributions to the fund are weighted in a way that the bigger polluters pay a higher percentage of their revenues/profits into the fund. doing that would allow the 'more clean' companies to gain a competitive advantage. Companies will then have to weigh the cost of producing cleaner energy with no fine or producing dirtier energy at a lower cost and paying the fine.
    Politicians who's campaigns are paid for by special interest lobbyists determine who pays what. We put our trust in these politicians to interfere with the free market to pick the companies in the industry that deserve an advantage over their competitors. These same companies can contribute limitless amounts through PACs to the 'rule makers' campaigns.
    Those lobbying costs also get passed down to the consumer. Do you really want to trust the same folks that brought you WMDs in Irag, watergate, hunter biden at burisma, iran-contra deal etc. to do all this in good faith to protect the earth? The details of the bill are left vague intentionally to allow the politicians to choose favorite...without the power to choose who wins there is no incentive PACs to contribute. Don't be fooled into thinking bill shifts the costs of oil pollution from the public to the companies, those costs will always be passed down to consumers.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News