• 4 minutes "Natural Gas Trading Picks Up Considerably Amid High Volatility" by Charles Kennedy - ...And is U.S. NatGas Futures dramatically overbought at the $6.35 range?
  • 8 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 12 minutes  What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
  • 1 min GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 16 hours Revisiting: "The U.S. Grid Isn’t Ready For A Major Shift To Renewables" from March 2021 by Irina Slav at OILPRICE
  • 3 days How cheap Chinese tires might explain Russia's 'stalled' 40-mile-long military convoy in Ukraine
  • 8 days "The Calm Before The Storm In Oil Markets" by Tom Kool of OILPRICE and seen at YahooFinance
  • 8 days Will Variants and Ill-Health Continue to Plague Economic Outlooks?
  • 1 day Natural Gas is the Cleanest and most Likely Source of Energy to Fuel the World.
  • 8 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 7 days "Russia will stop 'in a moment' if Ukraine meets terms - Kremlin" by Reuters via Yahoo News...but Reuters suddenly cut out the balanced part of the story.
Soaring Costs Set To Hurt U.S. Shale Production

Soaring Costs Set To Hurt U.S. Shale Production

With oil prices consistently above…

Democrats Propose Big Oil Polluters’ Fund

A group of Senate Democrats has proposed a fund of $500 billion, to be filled by Big Oil polluters over 10 years, “to require the biggest polluters to begin paying their fair share for a just clean energy transition,” according to a press release by one of the group, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen.

“Our idea is simple: those who pollute should pay to help clean up the mess they caused – and those who polluted the most should pay the most. This bill will ensure the costs of climate change are no longer borne solely by the American people – and instead require big corporate polluters to pay part of the clean-up bill,” Van Hollen said.

Others from the group, which includes Bernie Sanders, Ed Markey, Sheldon Whitehouse, Elizabeth Warren, and Jeff Merkley, commented that the Big Oil industry has been essentially profiting from polluting the country for decades, and that it was now time for it to start paying for this.

Senator Van Hollen also said that only the biggest polluters in the oil industry would be targeted, after the Treasury Department and the Environmental Protection Agency identify them. Specific company names were not listed, but Van Hollen said there would be about 25 to 30 companies that would be required to contribute to the fund.

He also mentioned “companies like ExxonMobil, BP, Shell, and Chevron” as the biggest polluters, saying they would have to shell out some $5-6 billion annually for the fund. 

“Responsibility to pay would be based on a strict liability standard – there is no requirement to prove negligence or intentional wrongdoing. The proposal does not assign blame for specific damages – it simply ensures that these companies contribute to the solution,” Van Hollen’s press release explained.

The sponsors of the Polluters Pay Climate Fund bill are hoping to have it voted on later this year as part of broader climate change-related legislation. 

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Patrick King on August 05 2021 said:
    Won't the oil consuming public end up paying as big oil companies increase prices to pass along the cost to consumers? Unless companies' contributions to the fund are weighted in a way that the bigger polluters pay a higher percentage of their revenues/profits into the fund. doing that would allow the 'more clean' companies to gain a competitive advantage. Companies will then have to weigh the cost of producing cleaner energy with no fine or producing dirtier energy at a lower cost and paying the fine.
    Politicians who's campaigns are paid for by special interest lobbyists determine who pays what. We put our trust in these politicians to interfere with the free market to pick the companies in the industry that deserve an advantage over their competitors. These same companies can contribute limitless amounts through PACs to the 'rule makers' campaigns.
    Those lobbying costs also get passed down to the consumer. Do you really want to trust the same folks that brought you WMDs in Irag, watergate, hunter biden at burisma, iran-contra deal etc. to do all this in good faith to protect the earth? The details of the bill are left vague intentionally to allow the politicians to choose favorite...without the power to choose who wins there is no incentive PACs to contribute. Don't be fooled into thinking bill shifts the costs of oil pollution from the public to the companies, those costs will always be passed down to consumers.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News