• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 1 min One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 13 hours Once Upon A Time... North Korea Abruptly Withdraws Staff From Liaison Office
  • 14 hours Oil Slips Further From 2019 Highs On Trade Worries
  • 6 hours Modular Nuclear Reactors
  • 1 day Chile Tests Floating Solar Farm
  • 14 hours Poll: Will Renewables Save the World?
  • 7 hours Climate change's fingerprints are on U.S. Midwest floods
  • 2 days China's E-Buses Killing Diesel Demand
  • 2 days China's Expansion: Italy Leads Europe Into China’s Embrace
  • 9 hours Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 2 days Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 2 days Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 1 day US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 2 days New Rebate For EVs in Canada
Oil Is Set To Rise, But The Rally May Not Last

Oil Is Set To Rise, But The Rally May Not Last

The comparative crude oil inventories…

December Crude Spill In North Dakota Thrice As Big As Originally Estimated

Oil Spill

The crude oil spill that occurred in western North Dakota in December is now estimated to be three times larger than originally estimated, according to True Companies, the owner of the pipeline.

The new estimate makes the spill the largest in the state to affect water resources in over a decade, a new article by Reuters reports.

Spokesperson Wendy Owen clarified on Friday that the Belle Fourche crude pipeline spilled 12,615 barrels of oil, but an earlier evaluation of the leak measured spillage at 4,200 barrels.

Four-fifths of the spill has been cleaned up so far, Owen added over the phone, but not before running down a hill and into Ash Coulee Creek.

Had oil reached into the depths of the creek, it would have entered the Little Missouri River, and then the bigger Missouri River – which serves as a major source of drinking water for North Dakota and many other states.

Overall, the spill is the second-largest in over 15 years, right behind Tesoro Logistics’ 2013 spill that released 20,600 barrels into the facility’s surroundings.

Monitoring equipment had not originally detected the leak—which occurred just 150 miles away from the Standing Rock Sioux tribe—due to its irregular flow, True Companies has said in the past. The Belle Fourche line remains closed as repairs continue.

Related: TransCanada Gets Presidential Permit To Build Keystone XL

The Native American rights and environmental protestors argued that building the DAPL would endanger water resources for the nearby reservation and towns that lived further downstream. Standing Rock also claims that the project is in violation of treaty rights.

The $3.8-billion DAPL pipeline, which was last year suspended by the Obama administration but greenlighted again by Donald Trump, will carry crude from the North Dakota Bakken shale play to Illinois.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News