• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 11 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 5 hours Waste-to-Energy Chugging Along
  • 4 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 12 hours Contradictory: Euro Zone Takes Step To Deeper Integration, Key Issues Unresolved
  • 7 hours Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 8 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 1 hour Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 4 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 22 hours Zohr Giant Gas Field Increases Production Six-Fold
  • 9 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 21 hours No, The U.S. Is Not A Net Exporter Of Crude Oil
  • 17 hours UK Power and loss of power stations
  • 1 day USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 23 hours Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 18 hours EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants
OPEC+ Deal To Be Forged In March

OPEC+ Deal To Be Forged In March

OPEC and its Non-OPEC partners…

What’s Behind The Plunge In LNG Prices?

What’s Behind The Plunge In LNG Prices?

Warmer weather in Asia has…

Canada Needs One Oil Pipeline Regulator: Panel

Canadian Flag

A four-member panel set up last year by Canada’s Environment Minister has said that the country needs a single body to assess new oil pipeline and mining projects, to replace the current system where three separate agencies make decisions about such projects on federal land.

The Liberal government of Canada says people don’t trust the three-agency system and are especially suspicious of the decisions made by the National Energy Board – Canada’s energy regulator and the agency that vets or rejects new oil pipeline projects. According to the panel, there was a feeling that the NEB tended to decide in favor of the energy industry.

The panel recommended the setting up of a single Impact Assessment Authority that would handle energy and mining projects with more attention given to aboriginal communities’ interests and the long-term impacts of any one project.

There is wide opposition in Canada against new pipeline projects, but even a government as liberal as Justin Trudeau couldn’t deny the fact that the country’s existing pipeline network is operating at capacity while crude oil output is rising, as Oilprice reported last September.

This development is putting Canadian oil at risk: as pipeline capacity reaches its maximum, more oil will have to start being transported by railway. The bad news for these producers is that railway transportation of crude is costlier than pipelines, and they will have to increase the discount at which they sell their oil.

Conventional oil production in Canada is declining, and the biggest hopes for the revival of the country’s embattled energy industry are pinned on the oil sands. But Alberta is landlocked, so the heavy crude extracted there needs either pipelines to reach a coast or the U.S. refineries, or railways. This is where oil producers in the oil sands province find themselves between a rock and a hard place.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News