• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 1 hour Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 2 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 37 mins Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 6 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 10 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 11 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 11 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 6 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 13 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 19 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 19 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 17 hours Saudi Aramco IPO Seems Unlikely
  • 3 hours < sigh > $90 Oil Is A Very Real Possibility
Are Natural Gas Prices About To Break Out?

Are Natural Gas Prices About To Break Out?

Natural gas inventories are low…

Are The Saudis Involved In The Tesla Buyout Plan?

Are The Saudis Involved In The Tesla Buyout Plan?

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund…

Canada Needs One Oil Pipeline Regulator: Panel

Canadian Flag

A four-member panel set up last year by Canada’s Environment Minister has said that the country needs a single body to assess new oil pipeline and mining projects, to replace the current system where three separate agencies make decisions about such projects on federal land.

The Liberal government of Canada says people don’t trust the three-agency system and are especially suspicious of the decisions made by the National Energy Board – Canada’s energy regulator and the agency that vets or rejects new oil pipeline projects. According to the panel, there was a feeling that the NEB tended to decide in favor of the energy industry.

The panel recommended the setting up of a single Impact Assessment Authority that would handle energy and mining projects with more attention given to aboriginal communities’ interests and the long-term impacts of any one project.

There is wide opposition in Canada against new pipeline projects, but even a government as liberal as Justin Trudeau couldn’t deny the fact that the country’s existing pipeline network is operating at capacity while crude oil output is rising, as Oilprice reported last September.

This development is putting Canadian oil at risk: as pipeline capacity reaches its maximum, more oil will have to start being transported by railway. The bad news for these producers is that railway transportation of crude is costlier than pipelines, and they will have to increase the discount at which they sell their oil.

Conventional oil production in Canada is declining, and the biggest hopes for the revival of the country’s embattled energy industry are pinned on the oil sands. But Alberta is landlocked, so the heavy crude extracted there needs either pipelines to reach a coast or the U.S. refineries, or railways. This is where oil producers in the oil sands province find themselves between a rock and a hard place.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News