• 2 minutes Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 4 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 7 minutes Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 43 mins China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 42 mins Joe Biden the "Archie Bunker" of the left selects Kamala Harris for VP . . . . . . Does she help the campaign ?
  • 6 hours Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 1 day US will pay for companies to bring supply chains home from China: Kudlow - COVID-19 has highlighted the problem of relying too heavily on one country for production
  • 3 days Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 3 days China's impending economic meltdown
  • 6 hours Oil Tanker Runs Aground in Mauritius - Oil Spill
  • 15 hours Trump is turning USA into a 3rd world dictatorship
  • 2 days Liquid Air Battery
  • 2 days What the heroin industry can teach us about solar power (BBC)
  • 3 days The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 3 days Why Oil could hit $100
  • 3 days Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
The Oil And Gas Industry Is Going Remote

The Oil And Gas Industry Is Going Remote

The oil crash of 2020…

Oil Rallies Despite String Of Bearish News

Oil Rallies Despite String Of Bearish News

Oil prices reversed course and…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Lack Of Pipeline Capacity Could Force Down Canadian Crude Prices

The pipelines carrying Canadian heavy crude to the U.S. are running at capacity and soon, more oil will have to start being transported by railway as oil sands operators ramp up production. The bad news for these producers is that railway transportation of crude is costlier than pipelines, and they will have to increase the discount at which they sell their oil.

Canadian oil exports to its southern neighbor have exceeded 3 million bpd for the last six weeks, except for one, when the average daily dipped to 2.95 million barrels. At the same time, pipeline projects, both local and cross-border, have stumbled on vigorous opposition from environmentalists and native communities.

Keystone XL, which should have run from Alberta to the Gulf Coast refineries, was shelved last year after a wide-scale environmental campaign. Another TransCanada pipeline project – Energy East – which should have shipped crude to the Atlantic coast is being reviewed amid protests that, earlier this month, put a premature end to the hearings about the project at the national Energy Board. These are just a couple of examples that paint a disheartening picture of the tight corner that Alberta oil sands producers have found themselves in. They also highlight the excessive dependence of Canadian E&P’s on the U.S. market.

Conventional oil production in Canada is declining and the biggest hopes for the revival of the country’s embattled energy industry are pinned on the oil sands. But Alberta is landlocked, so the heavy crude extracted there needs either pipelines to reach a coast or the U.S. refineries, or railways. This is where oil producers in the oil sands province find themselves between a rock and a hard place. Related: Is The Next Shale Boom About To Unfold In Mexico?

Western Canada Select already sells at s discount of some $14.30 a barrel to West Texas Intermediate, according to Bloomberg data. This discount could reach $16 a barrel before the year’s end, according to one analyst from ARB Midstream, a company specializing in oil transport investments. This discount could interfere with E&Ps attempts to get back on their feet after the wildfires from May that took out about a million bpd in Alberta, especially given that oil prices are still subdued and likely to remain so in the foreseeable future.

Meanwhile, over $40 billion in fresh investment is seen to be splashed on oil sands development through 2026. Local producers appear to be determined to expand production but in light of the news about pipelines overflowing with crude, the question about where this production will go and at what price, remains open.

The oil industry of Canada is in dire need of government support, it seems. Support that will somehow juggle the government’s environmental commitments and the environmental lobby with the interests of the oil industry. It’s a tough gig for PM Trudeau’s cabinet, as Oilprice wrote earlier this month and the country’s midstream majors don’t seem to be buying it. Some of them are betting on acquisitions in the U.S. to ensure profitability, such as it is. Others – Cenovus and Canadian Natural Resources – have announced they will add pipeline capacity of 390,000 bpd by the end of 2017, which is some light at the end of the tunnel. Still, the problem with Canada oil industry’s overdependence on the U.S. market remains and will remain until the industry and the environmentalist lobby find a mutually beneficial solution.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Joe on September 27 2016 said:
    Good article, but I wish Oilprice.com would quit showing pictures of the Alaska Pipeline above pipeline articles. It is one of the only above-ground pipelines in North America. The vast majority of pipelines are underground and when under farmer's fields the ground can still be farmed. In most cases a person would not know it's there. Please quit it already; it's embarrassing.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News