• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 1 day Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 1 day Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 1 day Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 1 day Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 1 day Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 1 day Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Are Oil Markets Becoming Immune To Geopolitical Risk?

Are Oil Markets Becoming Immune To Geopolitical Risk?

The geopolitical risk premium in…

Buyer Beware: Many US Homes are Sold without Mineral Rights to the Land

Buyer Beware: Many US Homes are Sold without Mineral Rights to the Land

Property developers in the US, aware that land value increases massively as soon as mineral deposits are found in the area, have begun to retain oil and natural gas extraction rights beneath the houses that they sell; ready to sell those rights on to any interested energy companies in the future. In many cases they don’t even advise the property buyers.

Reuters wrote that tens of thousands of families across the US have moved into new houses on golf courses, gated communities, or other housing developments in recent years, with no idea, that when paying for their new home, they were never buying the rights to the land beneath.

Related article: Our Reliance on Oil Continues to Threaten our Future

As energy companies rove the country in search of new shale formations to add to the boom in shale extraction, land value increases many times wherever they decide to explore. Developers have decided to take advantage of this by retaining the mineral rights to the land under their houses, and then selling them on at inflated prices if an energy company ever comes a calling.

Reuters discovered that companies like D.R. Horton, the largest homebuilder in the US, have begun to keep all mineral rights when selling their homes, “separating the mineral rights from tens of thousands of homes in states where shale plays are either well underway or possible, including North Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Virginia, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, Oklahoma, Utah, Idaho, Texas, Colorado, Washington and California. In Florida alone, the builder has kept the mineral rights underneath more than 10,000 lots, a review of county property records shows.”

In many states the fact that mineral rights are not included in the sale of the house does not have to be mentioned to the home buyers, in others it might just be mentioned as a brief clause in a long sales contract, which few people read to the end.

Related article: First Floating LNG Game-Changer for Uruguay

Richard Goodrich, whilst negotiating the purchase of his home at the Valencia Golf and Country Club in Naples, Florida, was one of the few to actually notice that the mineral rights were not included in the price of his house. “If somebody wanted the mineral rights, then obviously there was a value.” He tried to negotiate their inclusion into the purchase of his house, but found that “it wasn't negotiable. We either gave up the minerals or we didn't get the house.”

Reuters mention that one community in Colorado only found out that they didn’t own the rights to the minerals under their land, when they were invited to a community meeting in which an energy company announced that it would shortly begin drilling for oil and gas beneath their homes. The community took the company to court to try and earn a ban against the fracking, but lost the case.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Dick on October 15 2013 said:
    A sucker is really born every minute in this country. Ain't it great when they come tracking under your house and your mortgage documents shake into their folder.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News